Re: IMSC1.0.1 schemas as a WG Note now

> On 24 Jun 2017, at 17:20, Pierre-Anthony Lemieux <pal@sandflow.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Nigel,
> 
>> Why the complexity here?
> 
> I am concerned that modifying the github repo can be done by any
> number of folks, including by mistake.

It can; I would suggest tagging a release when we have a known good state (as far as we are aware at that time) and declaring the current operational release tag in a protected master branch readme file. 

Then any change would only be reflected in a new release by explicit decision, which could be by Group consensus. 

Nigel

> 
> Revising a WG Note requires group consensus.
> 
> I am open to other options.
> 
> Best,
> 
> -- Pierre
> 
>> On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 2:16 AM, Nigel Megitt <nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk> wrote:
>> Why the complexity here? Can't we just publish the GitHub repo details and host them directly from there? That makes them much easier to use and update.
>> 
>> Nigel
>> 
>> 
>>> On 24 Jun 2017, at 06:45, Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Mike,
>>> We don't necessarly need to have a WG Note for this.
>>> We can publish the current schemas files on the W3C site (out of TR) and that will be good enough. No over burdon.
>>> 
>>> I propose to host those schemas at
>>> 
>>> https://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/IMSC/ttml-imsc1.0.1/xml-schemas/
>>> 
>>> and change the link in the spec to this URI.
>>> 
>>> Thierry
>>> 
>>>> Le 24/06/2017 à 01:04, Pierre-Anthony Lemieux a écrit :
>>>> Hi Mike,
>>>> 
>>>>> put the schemas in a WG Note now and reference it before publishing IMSC1.0.1.
>>>> 
>>>> Ok with me. I would create a separate directory on the IMSC github
>>>> repo to host the WG Note and XSD collection.
>>>> 
>>>> Happy to do this by Monday COB, in time for approval on Thursday and
>>>> the IMSC1.0.1 CR transition, unless significant concerns are raised.
>>>> 
>>>> This switch might not even be substantive since the XSD are
>>>> informative in IMSC1.
>>>> 
>>>> Best,
>>>> 
>>>> -- Pierre
>>>> 
>>>>> On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 3:59 PM, Michael Dolan <mike@dolan.tv> wrote:
>>>>> Given the apparent process challenges for updating the informative schemas
>>>>> for IMSC1, I’d like to propose that we do that before publication of
>>>>> IMSC1.0.1 – put the schemas in a WG Note now and reference it before
>>>>> publishing IMSC1.0.1.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>               Mike
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> ---------------------------
>>>>> 
>>>>> Michael A DOLAN
>>>>> 
>>>>> TBT, Inc;  PO Box 190
>>>>> 
>>>>> Del Mar, CA 92014
>>>>> 
>>>>> +1-858-882-7497
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -----------------------------
>> http://www.bbc.co.uk
>> This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and
>> may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated.
>> If you have received it in
>> error, please delete it from your system.
>> Do not use, copy or disclose the
>> information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender
>> immediately.
>> Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails
>> sent or received.
>> Further communication will signify your consent to
>> this.
>> -----------------------------

Received on Saturday, 24 June 2017 16:25:08 UTC