- From: Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2017 18:31:33 +0100
- To: Pierre-Anthony Lemieux <pal@sandflow.com>
- Cc: "member-tt@w3.org" <public-tt@w3.org>, Nigel Megitt <nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk>
Pierre,
I have uploaded the IMSC document at its final destination.
https://www.w3.org/TR/2017/WD-ttml-imsc1-20170131/
I have check it. It passes HTMLvalidator, CSSvalidator, PUBrules.
Linkcheker stills reports some errors but these are 503 and 403 so it
should be OK.
I will request publication to the webmaster now.
https://validator.w3.org/checklink?uri=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2FTR%2F2017%2FWD-ttml-imsc1-20170131%2F&hide_type=all&recursive=on&depth=&check=Check
see report following
Note that http://www.microsoft.com/typography/fonts/family.aspx?FID=10
and http://www.microsoft.com/typography/fonts/family.aspx?FID=8
also work for me, so I also don't know why the link checker complains
with a 503 Service Unavailable.
----------------------------------------------------------
Status: 403 Forbidden
The link is forbidden! This needs fixing. Usual suspects: a missing
index.html or Overview.html, or a missing ACL.
info Line: 697 mailto:public-tt@w3.org?subject=%5Bimsc%5D
Status: (N/A) Access to 'mailto' URIs has been disabled
Accessing links with this URI scheme has been disabled in link
checker.
info Line: 697 mailto:public-tt-request@w3.org?subject=subscribe
Status: (N/A) Access to 'mailto' URIs has been disabled
Accessing links with this URI scheme has been disabled in link
checker.
info Line: 660 mailto:pal@sandflow.com
Status: (N/A) Access to 'mailto' URIs has been disabled
Accessing links with this URI scheme has been disabled in link
checker.
error Line: 3996 http://www.microsoft.com/typography/fonts/family.aspx?FID=8
Status: 503 Service Unavailable
Thierry
Le 27/01/2017 à 17:07, Pierre-Anthony Lemieux a écrit :
> Hi Thierry,
>
> I have pushed a commit [1] intended to fix the links.
>
> [1] https://github.com/w3c/imsc/commit/26dfdc633f5a6650b25180931db4e711f509e7be
>
> Note that http://www.microsoft.com/typography/fonts/family.aspx?FID=10
> and http://www.microsoft.com/typography/fonts/family.aspx?FID=8 work
> for me, so I am not sure why the link checker complains
>
> Best,
>
> -- Pierre
>
> On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 3:39 AM, Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org> wrote:
>>
>> Pierre,
>>
>> I have found another bug for the IMSC schemas index file
>> https://www.w3.org/TR/2017/WD-ttml-imsc1-20170131/xml-schemas/index.html
>>
>>
>> It uses absolute links to the IMSC1 CR version of 20160126
>>
>>
>> It should use relative links instead.
>>
>> <li> <a
>> href="https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/CR-ttml-imsc1-20160126/xml-schemas/imsc1.xsd">imsc1.xsd
>> </a></li>
>> <li> <a
>> href="https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/CR-ttml-imsc1-20160126/xml-schemas/imsc1-all.xsd">imsc1-all.xsd</a></li>
>> <li> <a
>> href="https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/CR-ttml-imsc1-20160126/xml-schemas/imsc1-metadata.xsd">imsc1-metadata.xsd</a></li>
>> <li> <a
>> href="https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/CR-ttml-imsc1-20160126/xml-schemas/imsc1-parameters.xsd">imsc1-parameters.xsd</a></li>
>> <li> <a
>> href="https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/CR-ttml-imsc1-20160126/xml-schemas/imsc1-styling.xsd">imsc1-styling.xsd</a></li>
>>
>>
>> Can you please update:
>> https://github.com/w3c/imsc/blob/FPWD-imsc-1.0.1/imsc1/spec/xml-schemas/index.html
>>
>>
>> Note that the index file is correct in the IMSC1 REC
>>
>> https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/REC-ttml-imsc1-20160421/xml-schemas/index.html
>>
>> <li> <a href="imsc1.xsd">imsc1.xsd </a></li>
>> <li> <a href="imsc1-all.xsd">imsc1-all.xsd</a></li>
>> <li> <a href="imsc1-metadata.xsd">imsc1-metadata.xsd</a></li>
>> <li> <a href="imsc1-parameters.xsd">imsc1-parameters.xsd</a></li>
>> <li> <a href="imsc1-styling.xsd">imsc1-styling.xsd</a></li>
>>
>> Best,
>> Thierry.
>>
>>
>> Le 26/01/2017 à 18:26, Pierre-Anthony Lemieux a écrit :
>>>
>>> Hi Thierry,
>>>
>>> Please find at [1] the proposed IMSC 1.0.1 FPWD [1].
>>>
>>> [1] https://github.com/w3c/imsc/tree/FPWD-imsc-1.0.1/imsc1/spec
>>>
>>> I have set the publication date to next Tuesday.
>>>
>>> Let me know if you need additional information.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>>
>>> -- Pierre
>>>
>>
Received on Friday, 27 January 2017 17:31:46 UTC