- From: Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2017 18:31:33 +0100
- To: Pierre-Anthony Lemieux <pal@sandflow.com>
- Cc: "member-tt@w3.org" <public-tt@w3.org>, Nigel Megitt <nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk>
Pierre, I have uploaded the IMSC document at its final destination. https://www.w3.org/TR/2017/WD-ttml-imsc1-20170131/ I have check it. It passes HTMLvalidator, CSSvalidator, PUBrules. Linkcheker stills reports some errors but these are 503 and 403 so it should be OK. I will request publication to the webmaster now. https://validator.w3.org/checklink?uri=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2FTR%2F2017%2FWD-ttml-imsc1-20170131%2F&hide_type=all&recursive=on&depth=&check=Check see report following Note that http://www.microsoft.com/typography/fonts/family.aspx?FID=10 and http://www.microsoft.com/typography/fonts/family.aspx?FID=8 also work for me, so I also don't know why the link checker complains with a 503 Service Unavailable. ---------------------------------------------------------- Status: 403 Forbidden The link is forbidden! This needs fixing. Usual suspects: a missing index.html or Overview.html, or a missing ACL. info Line: 697 mailto:public-tt@w3.org?subject=%5Bimsc%5D Status: (N/A) Access to 'mailto' URIs has been disabled Accessing links with this URI scheme has been disabled in link checker. info Line: 697 mailto:public-tt-request@w3.org?subject=subscribe Status: (N/A) Access to 'mailto' URIs has been disabled Accessing links with this URI scheme has been disabled in link checker. info Line: 660 mailto:pal@sandflow.com Status: (N/A) Access to 'mailto' URIs has been disabled Accessing links with this URI scheme has been disabled in link checker. error Line: 3996 http://www.microsoft.com/typography/fonts/family.aspx?FID=8 Status: 503 Service Unavailable Thierry Le 27/01/2017 à 17:07, Pierre-Anthony Lemieux a écrit : > Hi Thierry, > > I have pushed a commit [1] intended to fix the links. > > [1] https://github.com/w3c/imsc/commit/26dfdc633f5a6650b25180931db4e711f509e7be > > Note that http://www.microsoft.com/typography/fonts/family.aspx?FID=10 > and http://www.microsoft.com/typography/fonts/family.aspx?FID=8 work > for me, so I am not sure why the link checker complains > > Best, > > -- Pierre > > On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 3:39 AM, Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org> wrote: >> >> Pierre, >> >> I have found another bug for the IMSC schemas index file >> https://www.w3.org/TR/2017/WD-ttml-imsc1-20170131/xml-schemas/index.html >> >> >> It uses absolute links to the IMSC1 CR version of 20160126 >> >> >> It should use relative links instead. >> >> <li> <a >> href="https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/CR-ttml-imsc1-20160126/xml-schemas/imsc1.xsd">imsc1.xsd >> </a></li> >> <li> <a >> href="https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/CR-ttml-imsc1-20160126/xml-schemas/imsc1-all.xsd">imsc1-all.xsd</a></li> >> <li> <a >> href="https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/CR-ttml-imsc1-20160126/xml-schemas/imsc1-metadata.xsd">imsc1-metadata.xsd</a></li> >> <li> <a >> href="https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/CR-ttml-imsc1-20160126/xml-schemas/imsc1-parameters.xsd">imsc1-parameters.xsd</a></li> >> <li> <a >> href="https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/CR-ttml-imsc1-20160126/xml-schemas/imsc1-styling.xsd">imsc1-styling.xsd</a></li> >> >> >> Can you please update: >> https://github.com/w3c/imsc/blob/FPWD-imsc-1.0.1/imsc1/spec/xml-schemas/index.html >> >> >> Note that the index file is correct in the IMSC1 REC >> >> https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/REC-ttml-imsc1-20160421/xml-schemas/index.html >> >> <li> <a href="imsc1.xsd">imsc1.xsd </a></li> >> <li> <a href="imsc1-all.xsd">imsc1-all.xsd</a></li> >> <li> <a href="imsc1-metadata.xsd">imsc1-metadata.xsd</a></li> >> <li> <a href="imsc1-parameters.xsd">imsc1-parameters.xsd</a></li> >> <li> <a href="imsc1-styling.xsd">imsc1-styling.xsd</a></li> >> >> Best, >> Thierry. >> >> >> Le 26/01/2017 à 18:26, Pierre-Anthony Lemieux a écrit : >>> >>> Hi Thierry, >>> >>> Please find at [1] the proposed IMSC 1.0.1 FPWD [1]. >>> >>> [1] https://github.com/w3c/imsc/tree/FPWD-imsc-1.0.1/imsc1/spec >>> >>> I have set the publication date to next Tuesday. >>> >>> Let me know if you need additional information. >>> >>> Best, >>> >>> -- Pierre >>> >>
Received on Friday, 27 January 2017 17:31:46 UTC