- From: Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2017 09:58:35 +0200
- To: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
- Cc: David Singer <singer@apple.com>, Nigel Megitt <nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk>, Andreas Tai <tai@irt.de>, Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>, Benjamin Schaaf <ben.schaaf@gmail.com>, Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>, W3C Public TTWG <public-tt@w3.org>
Le 03/08/2017 à 23:38, Silvia Pfeiffer a écrit : > comments inline > > On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 3:20 AM, Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org> wrote: >> David, >> >> see my responses in line. >> >> >>>> Le 02/08/2017 à 01:15, David Singer a écrit : >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Hi Thierry >>>>> >>>>> I think the TT group has now had a month to complain or comment on the >>>>> disposition, so I think we can/should take them as OK. See >>>>> <https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-tt/2017Jun/0109.html> >>>>> >>>>> We have a new WD, thank you. I think we should formally re-request Wide >>>>> Review with the hope of a CR transition soon. >> >> >> I have edited a new WD for the wide review ending sept 22nd. >> https://www.w3.org/TR/2017/WD-webvtt1-20170808/ > > > Should it be living at https://www.w3.org/TR/webvtt1/ ? Yes of course it will, once the webmaster has done publication. > > (I'll make sure to copy it into our code repository also.) OK. Only the SotD was changed. > > > BTW: the linked Changes page at > https://www.w3.org/TR/2017/WD-webvtt1-20170808/changes-FPWD.html loads > as empty. Did something go wrong during publishing? Right I know. The publication is not done yet. It will on tuesday. Currently only the files have been uploaded to their final destination. I have uploaded yesterday the changes-FPWD.html file and the server went wrong. Now the file is like locked and I can't update it. Therefore when I have sent the publication request yesterday to the Webmaster, I asked him to fix this file issue. > > > >> I will prepare the wide review request message and send you a draft. >> >> >> The previous Wide Review is >>>>> >>>>> extensively documented <https://www.w3.org/wiki/WebVTT_Wide_Review> as >>>>> you >>>>> know. >> >> >> >> This documents looks a bit like a disposition of comments for the first wide >> review in 2014. It is edited in a wiki (there is no formal document required >> for this by the W3C process). >> >> All comments seems to have been processed. >> >> - One is resolved but probably not incorporated "2.3- Done - CG resolution". > > If you go find that one, its this table line: > > I-1 in 6.2.1 line heights bug 28269 works for me, accepted by author > (use CSS) ed 2.3 > > So, the author has accepted the resolution. Ok so we should track those commenter approval, and have links to the commenter approval message, as we will need to show this to the director when transiting to CR. > > > Kind Regards, > Silvia. > > >> - Some are resolved and incorporated into the specs (marked as "2.4- Done - >> CG resolution and spec update"). >> >> >> - Some are resolved but rejected : "2.7- Done but comment Rejected" >> >> >> In all cases, did the commenters agreed to these CG resolutions? >> >> If yes, could you provide links to approuval message? >> >> If no, we must go through a regular process to contact commenters and get >> their approuval, and the TTWG could then change the status to the following. >> >> >> 3.1- CG resolution approuved by WG >> 3.2- Approuved and Response drafted >> 3.3- Response send to commenter >> 3.4- Response agreed by commenter >> 3.5- Response rejected by commenter (need more discussion - back to step >> 2.5) >> 3.6- Response partially agreed by commenter (need more discussion - back to >> step 2.5) >> >> Thierry >
Received on Friday, 4 August 2017 07:58:52 UTC