- From: Dae Kim <dakim@netflix.com>
- Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 14:07:27 -0700
- To: Nigel Megitt <nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk>
- Cc: Timed Text Working Group <public-tt@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CA+t+Ut_XNkbM3amkerne-PL_RnR81+Z6afqjF7K7RCHpV=cP=A@mail.gmail.com>
David and Eleka both feel any solution for this should end up in CSS Inline Level 3 <https://drafts.csswg.org/css-inline/>. Based on our own TTML2/IMSC2 timelines, the best we can realistically hope for in terms of a CSS solution is a WD or ED while we're preparing for TTML2 Rec. Given how new this stretch concept is (and assuming other members of CSS are on board), do we feel comfortable baking TTML2/IMSC2 with a CSS draft concept? -Dae *Dae Kim | Senior Video Engineer | Encoding Technology* *9420 94f4 a834 b038 2920 34b3 38ad b632 3738 942c 942f* On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 9:49 AM, Nigel Megitt <nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk> wrote: > For those not following the issue on github there has been a response > about the request to be able to set the background height of inline areas – > see https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/814#issuecomment-295122693 > > Nigel > > > > ---------------------------- > > http://www.bbc.co.uk > This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal > views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated. > If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system. > Do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in > reliance on it and notify the sender immediately. > Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received. > Further communication will signify your consent to this. > > --------------------- >
Received on Wednesday, 19 April 2017 21:08:41 UTC