- From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2016 17:14:17 +1100
- To: Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org>
- Cc: David Singer <singer@apple.com>, Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>, W3C Public TTWG <public-tt@w3.org>
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 5:04 PM, Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org> wrote: > > > Le 19/10/2016 à 05:29, David Singer a écrit : >> >> >>> On Oct 18, 2016, at 18:42 , Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org> wrote: >>> >>> Simon, >>> If we start having diffs from the CG draft and the WG draft, it may be a >>> nightmare to synchronize those documents for publication. >>> >>> For TR we can't use normative reference linking to unstable documents. >>> >>> I suggest you have a normative ref to W3C DOM4 and an informative ref to >>> [WHATWG-DOM] and this would probably do the trick. >> >> >> It’s a hack, but OK. We could have a line in the text even saying “the >> formal spec. is at X but the version at Y may be more up to date” > > > yes but if the text to link to a reference section (Normative or > informative). > It is easier to maintain references, than looking into URL in the the text. FWIW: the HTML reference is to the WHATWG version also, so we should be consistent. Cheers, Silvia.
Received on Wednesday, 19 October 2016 06:15:06 UTC