- From: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
- Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2016 09:29:59 -0800
- To: Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org>
- Cc: W3C Public TTWG <public-tt@w3.org>, Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
I hope I replied; I am fine with the charter saying either we will choose or may choose the software and document license, as that’s what I expect to choose. > On Mar 9, 2016, at 9:25 , Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com> wrote: > > On Mon, 07 Mar 2016 21:35:53 +0100, Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org> wrote: > >> David, Simon, >> >> I am currently working on the new TTWG Charter. >> https://w3c.github.io/charter-drafts/timed-text-charter-2016.html >> >> In section 8: >> ["This Working Group will use the W3C Document license for TTML and IMSC specifications. For other deliverables the Working Group may choose either the W3C Document license or the W3C Software and Document license."] >> >> Would you like to have the charter to explicitly say that the Working Group will use for WebVTT: >> - the W3C Document license >> - the W3C Software and Document license. >> >> Let me know ASAP. > > Of the two I prefer the W3C Software and Document license. > > Thanks, > -- > Simon Pieters > Opera Software David Singer Manager, Software Standards, Apple Inc.
Received on Wednesday, 9 March 2016 17:30:55 UTC