- From: Pierre-Anthony Lemieux <pal@sandflow.com>
- Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2016 10:11:19 -0700
- To: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
- Cc: "public-tt@w3.org" <public-tt@w3.org>
Hi Glenn, > order definitely matters Ok. Makes sense to me. I could not find a clear statement to that effect in TTML1. Do you see one? If not, perhaps add one in the next errata and updated TTML2 accordingly? Best, -- Pierre On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 10:08 AM, Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 10:53 AM, Pierre-Anthony Lemieux <pal@sandflow.com> > wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> (Hopefully) quick questions: (i) is the ordering of values in >> tts:fontFamily significant and (ii) does familyName take precedence >> over genericFamilyName? > > > order definitely matters > >> >> >> For instance, are the following two declarations equivalent? >> >> tts:fontFamily="proportionalSansSerif,Arial" >> tts:fontFamily="Arial,proportionalSansSerif" > > > it depends; if proportionalSansSerif maps to Arial (on some implementation) > then they would be equivalent (on that implementation) > >> >> >> ... and what is the expected outcome of the following? >> >> tts:fontFamily="proportionalSansSerif,proportionalSerif" > > > if proportionalSansSerif maps to F1 and proportionalSerif maps to F2, and if > the character maps (cmap tables) of both F1 and F2 define mappings for the > same set of characters, then the above would be equivalent to: > > tts:fontFamily="proportionalSansSerif" or > tts:fontFamily="F1" > >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> -- Pierre >> >
Received on Thursday, 7 July 2016 17:12:12 UTC