- From: Pierre-Anthony Lemieux <pal@sandflow.com>
- Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2015 07:32:49 -0700
- To: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
- Cc: Nigel Megitt <nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk>, Cyril Concolato <cyril.concolato@telecom-paristech.fr>, TTWG <public-tt@w3.org>
Hi all, ISSUE-448 [1] have been filed. [1] https://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/issues/448 Best, -- Pierre On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 7:24 AM, Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 2:08 AM, Nigel Megitt <nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk> wrote: >> >> In ยง 6.1 it is stated that the #profile feature MAY be used. I take this >> to mean that it is permitted to specify a ttp:profile attribute on the >> tt:tt element but not required. There's no suggestion of including the >> ttp:profile attribute within a document in a different location to what is >> defined in TTML1SE. > > > Unfortunately, the way that IMSC is specified, i.e., in terms of whether a > feature may be used or not, doesn't translate very well to guidance about > actual authoring. In this case, the #profile feature covers quite a bit of > functionality beyond @ttp:profile, and doesn't by itself address the > presence or absence of this attribute. > > I do see the following notes under 7.1 and 8.1: > > "As specified in 6.10 Features, the presence of the ttp:profile attribute is > not required by this profile. The profile designator specified above is > intended to be generally used to signal conformance of a Document Instance > to the profile. The details of such signaling depends on the application, > and can, for instance, use metadata structures out-of-band of the Document > Instance." > > For TTV support of IMSC1, we plan to emit a warning by default if no > @ttp:profile is specified. I would like to see IMSC1 updated to specify that > this profile SHOULD be specified. Whether it is specified or not is > independent of whether a processor supports the #profile feature as defined. > >> >> >> Since the same principle of extension as in TTML1SE applies, it is also >> legal (but out of scope of the specification) to include the >> ebuttm:conformsToStandard element but strict processors can ignore it. >> >> Kind regards, >> >> Nigel >> >> >> On 08/10/2015 08:56, "Cyril Concolato" >> <cyril.concolato@telecom-paristech.fr> wrote: >> >> >Hi, >> > >> >Reading IMSC1, it is unclear where the defined profile designators >> >should be used? In particular it says "the presence of the ttp:profile >> >attribute is not required by this profile." Why not? Where should it be >> >used? Is there an equivalent to ebutt:conformsToStandard to use them? >> > >> >Regards, >> >Cyril >> > >> >-- >> >Cyril Concolato >> >Multimedia Group / Telecom ParisTech >> >http://concolato.wp.mines-telecom.fr/ >> >@cconcolato >> > >> > >> >
Received on Thursday, 8 October 2015 14:33:38 UTC