W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tt@w3.org > June 2015

Re: draft of IMSC1 implementation report using WBS questionnaire.

From: Nigel Megitt <nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 10:47:04 +0000
To: Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org>, W3C Public TTWG <public-tt@w3.org>
Message-ID: <D19F0ADD.21AB8%nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk>
Thierry,

I suggest adding a question to ask how the respondent would like the
product to be publicly referenced, with options: "name provided" or
"anonymised".

We should also state in the intro that TTWG members can see the survey
results but not the general public. Also provide a contact in case a
respondent would like results to be hidden even from group members, so
that the details can be provided by text outside the WBS. My reason for
this approach is to deter people from taking this approach unless they
really need to.

I suggest the following wording for q1:

[[
This questionnaire is open to anyone wishing to report their
implementation conformance with the IMSC 1 test suite. The responses are
visible to members of the Timed Text Working Group. Implementors wishing
to keep their implementation details private may alternatively respond
with implementation details directly to <mailto:tmichel@w3.org> using the
text format version of this questionnaire at [link].
]]

Nigel


On 11/06/2015 09:49, "Thierry MICHEL" <tmichel@w3.org> wrote:

>Nigel,
>
>I hve upadated the WBS with your input.
>
>I also need to add some info fields to collect the implementer Company
>name and  product (implmenttion) name, version, etc.
>And if the product is public available, etc)
>
>This triggers the following questions/
>
>The WBS is currently available to all public. Responses collected are
>only Member visible. Should this be Team visible only ?
>
>Thierry
>
>
>
>
>On 11/06/2015 10:07, Nigel Megitt wrote:
>> Hi Thierry,
>>
>> The input fields are not visible, to me at least. Nevertheless, I think
>> your workaround in q4 is good enough.
>>
>> I would change the label 'Rationale' to 'Additional comments'.
>>
>> In q2, it would be helpful to change the TTWG mailing list reference
>>from
>> [1] to the email address itself, in the same style as your mailto link
>>for
>> Pierre.
>>
>> Kind regards,
>>
>> Nigel
>>
>>
>> On 11/06/2015 08:28, "Thierry MICHEL" <tmichel@w3.org> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I have started to draft an IMSC1 implementation report using WBS
>>> questionnaire.
>>>
>>> The first issue that I have encounter is that it is currently not
>>> possible  to edit in WBS a  <table> in a
>>> Question type: No input/ Simple Text
>>>
>>> see code in input field of question 3
>>> https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/1/IMSC1-implementation/q/q3/

>>>
>>> unfortunatly  HTML  table elements (<TABLE>, <TR>, etc) are ignored by
>>> WBS, therefore only the content is displayed.
>>> see display of question 3
>>> https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/1/IMSC1-implementation/#wbsq3

>>>
>>> I have asked the system Team to allow the following elements in WBS
>>> (tags like table, tbody, tr, th, td, etc).
>>>
>>> A work around is to avoid <table> and use <ul> instead, but I don't
>>>like
>>> it very much
>>> see display of question 4
>>> https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/1/IMSC1-implementation/#wbsq4

>>>
>>> Anyway this gives a first taste of  an IMSC1 implementation report
>>>using
>>> WBS questionnaire.
>>>
>>> Thierry
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Thierry
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>

Received on Thursday, 11 June 2015 10:47:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 5 October 2017 18:24:23 UTC