- From: Nigel Megitt <nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk>
- Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2015 15:50:05 +0000
- To: Timed Text Working Group <public-tt@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <D28614DC.2D365%nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk>
Thanks all for attending today's meeting. Minutes can be found in HTML format at http://www.w3.org/2015/12/03-tt-minutes.html
In text format:
[1]W3C
[1] http://www.w3.org/
Timed Text Working Group Teleconference
03 Dec 2015
See also: [2]IRC log
[2] http://www.w3.org/2015/12/03-tt-irc
Attendees
Present
Frans, nigel, pal, tmichel
Regrets
Chair
nigel
Scribe
nigel
Contents
* [3]Topics
1. [4]This meeting
2. [5]Action Items
3. [6]Charter
4. [7]IMSC
* [8]Summary of Action Items
* [9]Summary of Resolutions
__________________________________________________________
<scribe> scribe: nigel
This meeting
nigel: There's a bit of action to report on and I think we want
to cover IMSC pull requests in advance of CRs
pal: Yes, it looks like Glenn is still implementing so if we
move to a new CR now we may need another one in case more
issues get filed.
nigel: I'd like to know how much time Glenn will spend on it -
if its 1 week that gives us one view; if 3 months then it would
be another.
pal: That would be a good question to ask.
nigel: Anything else on the agenda?
group: No AOB
Action Items
action-452?
<trackbot> action-452 -- Nigel Megitt to Check with frans about
hosting the ibc slides on the ebu space, and send a link
around. -- due 2015-12-03 -- PENDINGREVIEW
<trackbot>
[10]http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/actions/452
[10] http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/actions/452
nigel: Thank you Frans for uploading the slides as requested,
onto the EBU space. I've updated the action with the URL:
[11]https://tech.ebu.ch/docs/events/IBC2015/EBU-TT-D_and_IMSC.p
df
[11] https://tech.ebu.ch/docs/events/IBC2015/EBU-TT-D_and_IMSC.pdf
Action-452: nigel to add link to wiki prior to closing this
action
<trackbot> Notes added to Action-452 Check with frans about
hosting the ibc slides on the ebu space, and send a link
around..
action-451?
<trackbot> action-451 -- Thierry Michel to Investigate if we
are required to move to the 2015 process -- due 2015-12-03 --
OPEN
<trackbot>
[12]http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/actions/451
[12] http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/actions/451
tmichel: I'm sorry that I cannot report because I've not been
able to discuss it with plh.
... I will ping him again today and hopefully report in a few
days.
pal: Thank you!
action-450?
<trackbot> action-450 -- Pierre-Anthony Lemieux to Check
character to glyph mappings for common script value -- due
2015-11-26 -- OPEN
<trackbot>
[13]http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/actions/450
[13] http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/actions/450
pal: We should actually file this as an issue on github
... I'll do that right now. And I'll include a prompt to remind
Glenn about the list of complex scripts.
... [files issue]
... Thank you for the reminder. This one is not fatal but we
should find a solution.
[14]https://github.com/w3c/imsc/issues/103
[14] https://github.com/w3c/imsc/issues/103
Action-450: This action moved to issue #103 on github at
[15]https://github.com/w3c/imsc/issues/103
[15] https://github.com/w3c/imsc/issues/103
<trackbot> Notes added to Action-450 Check character to glyph
mappings for common script value.
close action-450
<trackbot> Closed action-450.
Charter
nigel: I just want to remind us that as per
[16]http://www.w3.org/2015/10/29-tt-minutes.html#item01
... we need to prepare a new draft charter by the end of
January.
[16] http://www.w3.org/2015/10/29-tt-minutes.html#item01
IMSC
pal: I've merged 4 pull requests uneventfully.
... Related to issues #81, #84, #85 and #86
nigel: Great!
pal: The three remaining PRs will be on track to be closed
soon. People seem happy so
... we're just waiting for the 2 week review period.
... I don't have any other major things. Glenn has raised some
good issues that I'll address.
... I don't expect any further problems with those. How do we
manage the fact that we want
... folks to have ready access to the latest version.
nigel: I'll follow up with Glenn to get an estimate on his
timescales in implementing IMSC 1.
tmichel: Just to come back to the CR issue, I think now a new
trend that was advocated
... by plh is to publish the CR when the group has the level of
implementation readiness
... to exit CR.
nigel: I think that was based on being in WD - we're already in
CR.
tmichel: Well still we can use that idea. There are still
people working on implementation
... so we can wait until we're ready before going to the next
CR.
pal: I'm happy to wait. It was not obvious from the /TR page
that the ED was really what
... they ought to be looking at, but I'm happy to withhold a CR
until after Glenn has
... finished his initial implementation assuming that will be
soon.
tmichel: I agree that's not obvious for people. We're
requesting people to look at the ED
... to see the latest version but we're asking for
implementations on the CR - that's not
... easy to understand. We can still publish any number of CRs
with no problem. Now the process is easier too.
pal: One positive of publishing a new CR is that the delta
between successive CRs is smaller
... There's an argument for doing that even though we will have
the pain of another CR later.
nigel: I agree - it's just that if Glenn gives us a wrapped up
implementation report by the
... end of December then we'll think we should have waited.
pal: I agree with that. Let's target a CR version for next week
then.
tmichel: To clarify, my position is not to wait for more bug
fixes. Personally I think we
... should publish a new CR. What I'm saying now is that
there's this model that plh is pushing
... that simplifies the process. Myself I prefer to go to
another CR even if there's another one.
... And it's good to make the deltas shorter and shorter over
time.
pal: Let's say we set a target for next week to go to CR. Can
we close issues during the meeting?
nigel: We can, yes - I view the Pull Request as a call for
consensus, which for offline decisions
... is subject to the 2 week decision policy. If during a
meeting we have all the right inputs
... and the folk who raised the issue are happy with it then I
see that as equivalent to our
... previous working model of closing pending review issues.
pal: What do we need to do to move to a CR?
nigel: We need a version that we can propose to publish, and a
minuted resolution to publish,
... then we need to agree the conformance changes as being
substantive or not, and if there
... are any that are then we need to meet the Director.
pal: Can we see if we can schedule a meeting with the Director
for Dec 18?
tmichel: I'll look at the diary and see if we can manage that
pal: Okay that'd be the best option and would give us a couple
of weeks to clean up the
... SOTD section etc.
tmichel: I'll do that right now.
nigel: So you don't think any of the open issues needs
discussion?
pal: I'd appreciate review, but they all look fairly
straightforward.
nigel: Okay, I think we're out of agenda now so I'll adjourn -
thanks everyone! [adjourns meeting]
Summary of Action Items
Summary of Resolutions
[End of minutes]
__________________________________________________________
Minutes formatted by David Booth's [17]scribe.perl version
1.144 ([18]CVS log)
$Date: 2015/12/03 15:49:44 $
[17] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm
[18] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/
Received on Thursday, 3 December 2015 15:50:37 UTC