- From: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
- Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2014 07:11:12 -0600
- To: Nigel Megitt <nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk>
- Cc: Timed Text Working Group <public-tt@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 25 September 2014 13:12:00 UTC
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 3:48 AM, Nigel Megitt <nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk> wrote: > I've added the following review note to Issue-228: > > > Alignment with the proposed approach for Rubys in HTML5 has been > achieved semantically but not syntactically with the current draft proposal. > That (syntactic equivalence) has never been a goal or a requirement for any TTML feature adopted from other specifications. > One of the impacts of this is that, in order to support Rubys, processors > must also support #nested-span. > Correct. I don't see that as a problem. > Another is that an extra level of translation is needed to create an HTML5 > equivalent ISD including Rubys. > What do you mean by "extra level"? I don't see any extra level: it would simply be part of the same single translation layer. > > > Nigel >
Received on Thursday, 25 September 2014 13:12:00 UTC