- From: Pierre-Anthony Lemieux <pal@sandflow.com>
- Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 14:42:42 -0700
- To: Nigel Megitt <nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk>
- Cc: W3C Public TTWG <public-tt@w3.org>
> I've assumed so far that we'll use TTML1SE +1 since test content will be available. Also, assuming TTML2 remains largely a superset of TTML1SE, a mapping WebVTT(v?)<->TTML1SE should still apply to TTML2. Best, -- Pierre On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 1:50 PM, Nigel Megitt <nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk> wrote: > What's the (URL for the) best/most appropriate spec document for WebVTT to use as the baseline for our mapping work at the face to face next week? > > I've assumed so far that we'll use TTML1SE but would anyone prefer to target the editors draft of TTML2 instead? > > We don't have to stick to only one version if features are in flux but it would be helpful from a documentation perspective to be able to reference a specific document pair for which any given mapping holds true, as a baseline. We can and should note any areas where change is expected relative to that baseline. > > Nigel > >
Received on Wednesday, 10 September 2014 21:43:31 UTC