W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tt@w3.org > September 2014

Re: [VTT] [TTML2] [IMSC] Consensus call: publish all TTWG recommendation products under the 2014 process?

From: Pierre-Anthony Lemieux <pal@sandflow.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2014 08:59:30 -0700
Message-ID: <CAF_7JxC-MY_aRWVHfJa9VSBBnapYt_z3dEqv+XkmYrBddHLwPg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Nigel Megitt <nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk>
Cc: Michael Dolan <mdolan@newtbt.com>, Timed Text Working Group <public-tt@w3.org>
Looks like respec.js supports the 2014 process [1], so I have yet to
see a reason not to switch to the latter for IMSC 1.

[1] https://github.com/darobin/respec/commit/6aee8af6d62ab89725e95131418d60caea0029a9

Best,

-- Pierre

On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 8:51 AM, Nigel Megitt <nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk> wrote:
> Was: Re: [VTT] Consensus call:  publish VTT under the 2014 Process?
>
> Thank you Mike,
>
> As discussed on today's call the WG can certainly make this switch.
>
> Given the concern about not wanting to confuse folk by not consistently
> adopting the same process can I extend this consensus call to additionally
> include IMSC 1 and TTML2, and by default in future IMSC 2?
>
> We can aim to formalise this by the end of the F2F meeting in Geneva on
> September 17, in keeping with David's proposed deadline, assuming there
> are no unresolved objections.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Nigel
>
>
>
> On 04/09/2014 16:38, "Michael Dolan" <mdolan@newtbt.com> wrote:
>
>>I support this.
>>
>>Further, I propose that the new process be adopted for TTML2 and IMSC.
>>The
>>same benefits of agility and time to publication apply, and further I
>>think
>>it would be confusing for the WG and the public to have 3 Recs
>>concurrently
>>using a different processes. As I understand the W3C directive, the WG can
>>make this switch.
>>
>>Regards,
>>
>>       Mike
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: David Singer [mailto:singer@apple.com]
>>Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2014 11:59 AM
>>To: Silvia Pfieffer
>>Cc: Nigel Megitt; Timed Text Working Group
>>Subject: [VTT] Consensus call: publish VTT under the 2014 Process?
>>
>>
>>On Sep 2, 2014, at 6:05 , Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>> It would be nice to use this for WebVTT.
>>
>>Do we have consensus to do this, please?
>>
>>If you are OPPOSED to using the 2014 process for the VTT document(s),
>>please
>>speak up, or I will ask for it to happen.
>>
>>I suggest I wait two weeks for a response, i.e. the deadline is the 17th
>>of
>>September in this year of 2014.
>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Silvia.
>>>
>>> On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 10:20 PM, Nigel Megitt <nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk>
>>wrote:
>>>> All,
>>>>
>>>> FYI. At this stage I'm not proposing that we change our process:
>>>> would anyone prefer to adopt the new process for one of our Rec track
>>products?
>>>>
>>>> Kind regards,
>>>>
>>>> Nigel
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 02/09/2014 12:45, "Ian Jacobs" <ij@w3.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Dear Chairs,
>>>>>
>>>>> As announced in August [1], today W3C groups may begin to request
>>>>> publication of TR documents under the 2014 Process [2].
>>>>>
>>>>> Please note the following:
>>>>>
>>>>> 1) Pubrules [3] includes a requirement for new publications to include
>>>>>   a reference to the governing process. Respec [4] supports this new
>>>>>   requirement.
>>>>>
>>>>>   The pubrules checker user interface includes a new feature to
>>>>>   identify the governing process. For now it defaults to 2005 since
>>>>>   most documents are likely to be published under the 2005 process
>>>>>   for a while; we will change that as the balance shifts. If you are
>>>>>   checking a document to be published under the 2014 Process, please
>>>>>   select that one in the interface.
>>>>>
>>>>> 2) We have updated transitions documentation for the 2014 Process [5].
>>>>>   The transitions documentation for documents published under
>>>>>   the 2005 process remains unchanged [5].
>>>>>
>>>>> 3) We have created a new version "Register an Internet Media Type
>>>>>   for a W3C Spec" [7] for the new Process.
>>>>>
>>>>> For additional information about the transition to the 2014 Process,
>>>>> please see the FAQ [8].
>>>>>
>>>>> If you have any questions, please contact me or the Webmaster
>>>>> Jérémie Astori <jeremie@w3.org>.
>>>>>
>>>>> Ian Jacobs, Head of W3C Communications
>>>>>
>>>>> [1]
>>>>> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ac-members/2014JulSep/0016.
>>>>> html [2] http://www.w3.org/2014/08/Process-20140801/
>>>>> [3] http://www.w3.org/Guide/pubrules [4] http://www.w3.org/respec/
>>>>> [5] http://www.w3.org/Guide/transitions2014
>>>>> [6] http://www.w3.org/Guide/transitions
>>>>> [7] http://www.w3.org/2002/06/registering-mediatype2014.html
>>>>> [8] https://www.w3.org/wiki/ProcessTransition2014
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>      http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
>>>>> Tel:                       +1 718 260 9447
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>David Singer
>>Manager, Software Standards, Apple Inc.
>>
>>
>>
>
Received on Thursday, 4 September 2014 16:00:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 5 October 2017 18:24:17 UTC