- From: Pierre-Anthony Lemieux <pal@sandflow.com>
- Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2014 08:59:30 -0700
- To: Nigel Megitt <nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk>
- Cc: Michael Dolan <mdolan@newtbt.com>, Timed Text Working Group <public-tt@w3.org>
Looks like respec.js supports the 2014 process [1], so I have yet to see a reason not to switch to the latter for IMSC 1. [1] https://github.com/darobin/respec/commit/6aee8af6d62ab89725e95131418d60caea0029a9 Best, -- Pierre On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 8:51 AM, Nigel Megitt <nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk> wrote: > Was: Re: [VTT] Consensus call: publish VTT under the 2014 Process? > > Thank you Mike, > > As discussed on today's call the WG can certainly make this switch. > > Given the concern about not wanting to confuse folk by not consistently > adopting the same process can I extend this consensus call to additionally > include IMSC 1 and TTML2, and by default in future IMSC 2? > > We can aim to formalise this by the end of the F2F meeting in Geneva on > September 17, in keeping with David's proposed deadline, assuming there > are no unresolved objections. > > Kind regards, > > Nigel > > > > On 04/09/2014 16:38, "Michael Dolan" <mdolan@newtbt.com> wrote: > >>I support this. >> >>Further, I propose that the new process be adopted for TTML2 and IMSC. >>The >>same benefits of agility and time to publication apply, and further I >>think >>it would be confusing for the WG and the public to have 3 Recs >>concurrently >>using a different processes. As I understand the W3C directive, the WG can >>make this switch. >> >>Regards, >> >> Mike >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: David Singer [mailto:singer@apple.com] >>Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2014 11:59 AM >>To: Silvia Pfieffer >>Cc: Nigel Megitt; Timed Text Working Group >>Subject: [VTT] Consensus call: publish VTT under the 2014 Process? >> >> >>On Sep 2, 2014, at 6:05 , Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com> >>wrote: >> >>> It would be nice to use this for WebVTT. >> >>Do we have consensus to do this, please? >> >>If you are OPPOSED to using the 2014 process for the VTT document(s), >>please >>speak up, or I will ask for it to happen. >> >>I suggest I wait two weeks for a response, i.e. the deadline is the 17th >>of >>September in this year of 2014. >> >>> >>> Regards, >>> Silvia. >>> >>> On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 10:20 PM, Nigel Megitt <nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk> >>wrote: >>>> All, >>>> >>>> FYI. At this stage I'm not proposing that we change our process: >>>> would anyone prefer to adopt the new process for one of our Rec track >>products? >>>> >>>> Kind regards, >>>> >>>> Nigel >>>> >>>> >>>> On 02/09/2014 12:45, "Ian Jacobs" <ij@w3.org> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Dear Chairs, >>>>> >>>>> As announced in August [1], today W3C groups may begin to request >>>>> publication of TR documents under the 2014 Process [2]. >>>>> >>>>> Please note the following: >>>>> >>>>> 1) Pubrules [3] includes a requirement for new publications to include >>>>> a reference to the governing process. Respec [4] supports this new >>>>> requirement. >>>>> >>>>> The pubrules checker user interface includes a new feature to >>>>> identify the governing process. For now it defaults to 2005 since >>>>> most documents are likely to be published under the 2005 process >>>>> for a while; we will change that as the balance shifts. If you are >>>>> checking a document to be published under the 2014 Process, please >>>>> select that one in the interface. >>>>> >>>>> 2) We have updated transitions documentation for the 2014 Process [5]. >>>>> The transitions documentation for documents published under >>>>> the 2005 process remains unchanged [5]. >>>>> >>>>> 3) We have created a new version "Register an Internet Media Type >>>>> for a W3C Spec" [7] for the new Process. >>>>> >>>>> For additional information about the transition to the 2014 Process, >>>>> please see the FAQ [8]. >>>>> >>>>> If you have any questions, please contact me or the Webmaster >>>>> Jérémie Astori <jeremie@w3.org>. >>>>> >>>>> Ian Jacobs, Head of W3C Communications >>>>> >>>>> [1] >>>>> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ac-members/2014JulSep/0016. >>>>> html [2] http://www.w3.org/2014/08/Process-20140801/ >>>>> [3] http://www.w3.org/Guide/pubrules [4] http://www.w3.org/respec/ >>>>> [5] http://www.w3.org/Guide/transitions2014 >>>>> [6] http://www.w3.org/Guide/transitions >>>>> [7] http://www.w3.org/2002/06/registering-mediatype2014.html >>>>> [8] https://www.w3.org/wiki/ProcessTransition2014 >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org> http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs >>>>> Tel: +1 718 260 9447 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >>David Singer >>Manager, Software Standards, Apple Inc. >> >> >> >
Received on Thursday, 4 September 2014 16:00:21 UTC