- From: Michael Dolan <mdolan@newtbt.com>
- Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 09:10:59 -0700
- To: "'Timed Text Working Group'" <public-tt@w3.org>
Because that's not a stable URL. -----Original Message----- From: Nigel Megitt [mailto:nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk] Sent: Friday, October 10, 2014 9:03 AM To: Michael Dolan; 'Timed Text Working Group' Subject: Re: [imsc] Missing link Why not https://www.smpte.org/sites/default/files/st2052-1-2010.pdf which is what Google gives? On 10/10/2014 16:59, "Michael Dolan" <mdolan@newtbt.com> wrote: >I'd recommend: https://www.smpte.org/standards > >-----Original Message----- >From: Cyril Concolato [mailto:cyril.concolato@telecom-paristech.fr] >Sent: Friday, October 10, 2014 8:45 AM >To: Timed Text Working Group >Subject: [imsc] Missing link > >Hi Pierre, > >While reading the draft I noticed that the SMPTE spec does not have a >direct link to the document, which is not really convenient for >readers. >Could you add it? > >Cyril > >-- >Cyril Concolato >Multimedia Group / Telecom ParisTech >http://concolato.wp.mines-telecom.fr/ >@cconcolato > > >
Received on Friday, 10 October 2014 16:11:45 UTC