[imsc]

Thierry et al,

I have reviewed the latest document, and due to the nature
of my comments there was no related changes for me to agree to.

However I can "agree" with this lack of changes.

Peter.

> On 13/11/14 17:54, tmichel@w3.org wrote:
>>  Dear Peter Cherriman ,
>>
>> The Timed Text Working Group has reviewed the comments you sent [1] on the
>> Last Call Working Draft [2] of the IMSC 1.0 published on 30 Sep 2014. Thank
>> you for having taken the time to review the document and to send us
>> comments!
>>
>> The Working Group's response to your comment is included below, and has
>> been implemented in the new version of the document available at:
>> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ttml/raw-file/tip/ttml-ww-profiles/ttml-ww-profiles.html.
>>
>> Please review it carefully and let us know by email at
>> public-tt@w3.org?subject=%5Bimsc%5D if you agree with it or not before 20
>> November 2014. In case of disagreement, you are requested to provide a
>> specific solution for or a path to a consensus with the Working Group. If
>> such a consensus cannot be achieved, you will be given the opportunity to
>> raise a formal objection which will then be reviewed by the Director during
>> the transition of this document to the next stage in the W3C Recommendation
>> Track.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> For the Timed Text Working Group,
>> Thierry Michel
>> Philippe Le Hégaret
>> W3C Staff Contacts
>>
>>  1. http://www.w3.org/mid/544E3685.3050509@rd.bbc.co.uk
>>  2. http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/WD-ttml-imsc1-20140930/
>>     


-- 
Dr. Peter Cherriman
Senior R&D Engineer
BBC Research & Development

Received on Thursday, 20 November 2014 08:25:23 UTC