- From: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 09:48:18 -0600
- To: Michael Dolan <mdolan@newtbt.com>
- Cc: TTWG <public-tt@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CACQ=j+eZg4kMxHod8-joyXk_dxzT=RrBX6Nzm-33GiXTdd+bXg@mail.gmail.com>
i can see this subject is not going to be resolved easily as we clearly have a large gap about requirements; e.g., i think there are no requirements to signal content conformance, but only client processor requirements, i think we must use the TTML profile mechanism, etc On Thursday, May 15, 2014, Michael Dolan <mdolan@newtbt.com> wrote: > Maybe "highly undesirable", but if we don't address the A + B signaling > explicitly, then profiles need to be created for all the combinitorics of > namespaces in practice. Not the end of the world, but virtually prevents > the > simple signaling of 3rd party namespaces already provided by the > namespace/schemaLocation mechanism today. No I am not proposing we use that > - I am pointing out a deficiency in this proposal that we already address > today in 14496. > > Anyway, we need to go through the points in my email a week ago - if not > today, then on the 29th. > > Mike > > -----Original Message----- > From: David Singer [mailto:singer@mac.com <javascript:;>] > Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2014 5:20 AM > To: Glenn Adams > Cc: TTWG > Subject: Re: Draft TTML Codecs Registry > > OK > > Though it will be a sub-parameter of the codecs parameter for the MP4 file > type, from the point of view of TTML it's actually a profile short name > registry rather than codecs registry, so I think we should rename it. > > the values here should be usable in both > a) the profiles parameter for the TTML mime type > b) the codecs parameter for the MP4 mime type > > so, also "named codecs" -> "named profiles" > > > > I agree with Cyril that we only need a single operator here (implement one > of these profiles and you're good to go), both because we don't need the > complexity, and because a "implement both/all of these" is effectively > inviting file authors to make up new profiles ("to process this document > you > have to implement both A and B"), which is (IMHO) highly undesirable. > > > > On May 15, 2014, at 9:55 , Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com <javascript:;>> > wrote: > > > See [1]. > > > > [1] https://www.w3.org/wiki/TTML/CodecsRegistry > > Dave Singer > > singer@mac.com <javascript:;> > > > >
Received on Thursday, 15 May 2014 15:48:48 UTC