{minutes} TTWG Meeting 6/3/2014

Minutes for today's TTWG, available at http://www.w3.org/2014/03/06-tt-minutes.html



   [1]W3C

      [1] http://www.w3.org/


                               - DRAFT -

                Timed Text Working Group Teleconference

06 Mar 2014

   See also: [2]IRC log

      [2] http://www.w3.org/2014/03/06-tt-irc


Attendees

   Present
          nigel, glenn, jdsmith, Thierry

   Regrets
          pal, frans_de_jong

   Chair
          nigel

   Scribe
          nigel

Contents

     * [3]Topics
         1. [4]Charter
         2. [5]Action items
         3. [6]Issues discussed over the last week
         4. [7]Change Proposals
         5. [8]AOB
     * [9]Summary of Action Items
     __________________________________________________________

   <trackbot> Date: 06 March 2014

   <glenn>
   [10]https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ttml/raw-file/tip/ttml2/spec/ttml2.h

   tml#cea708-mapping

     [10] https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ttml/raw-file/tip/ttml2/spec/ttml2.html#cea708-mapping


   <scribe> scribeNick: nigel

Charter

   No comments on this agenda item at this time.

Action items

   action-268?

   <trackbot> action-268 -- Nigel Megitt to Estimate timelines for
   ttml 2 deliberables with glenn -- due 2014-02-27 -- OPEN

   <trackbot>
   [11]http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/actions/268


     [11] http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/actions/268


   nigel: Glenn and I discussed this, main determining factor is
   Glenn's availability and resource scheduling.

   [12]http://www.w3.org/2013/10/timed-text-charter.html


     [12] http://www.w3.org/2013/10/timed-text-charter.html


   nigel: Getting to TTML2 LC by April looks very ambitious at
   this point.

   glenn: would like to target June 1 for 1st WD, then August 1
   for LC
   ... taking into account my availability, and conservative
   scheduling.
   ... The CR period is 6 months, whereas 3 months would probably
   be adequate.
   ... PR to Rec shouldn't take more than 2 weeks.
   ... The only thing needed is to poll the membership.
   ... The average is no more than 1 month.
   ... I propose for TTML2 August 2014 LC, Oct 2014 CR, Jan 2015
   PR, Feb 2015 Rec.
   ... The work is not process work but is implementation and
   technical work, which should be prior to or during LC or CR
   period.
   ... That gives us overall 6 months for LC/CR period, which is
   very generous.

   nigel: We're still dependent on contributions, but as we have
   one editor whom everything has to go through this is important.

   action-269

   <trackbot> action-269 -- Glenn Adams to Implement issue-282
   changes on ttml2 text also -- due 2014-03-06 -- PENDINGREVIEW

   <trackbot>
   [13]http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/actions/269


     [13] http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/actions/269


   glenn: now Pending Review. Implemented this morning.

   close action-269

   <trackbot> Closed action-269.

   action-270

   <trackbot> action-270 -- Glenn Adams to Add informative
   appendix to ttml2 on subject of 708 mapping, where it refers to
   st2052-11 as starting point, and provides place to extend or
   elaborate mapping information -- due 2014-03-06 --
   PENDINGREVIEW

   <trackbot>
   [14]http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/actions/270


     [14] http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/actions/270


   nigel: currently a placeholder.

   glenn: marked as an Editor note, which is a placeholder to do
   this later. We don't put actions on Editor notes - two record
   keeping mechanisms aren't needed.
   ... There are 29 such notes, which is a backlog to process.

   jdsmith: it would be useful to have a broad review of all the
   updates on editors notes later.

   glenn: when I make the updates I put them in the repository and
   inform the group asynchronously. We generally in the past
   haven't created actions, though
   ... some of them are associated with issues - we typically
   close the issue when we've accepted the editor's changes.

   close action-270

   <trackbot> Closed action-270.

   action-271?

   <trackbot> action-271 -- Nigel Megitt to Draft email to css wg
   chair requesting box-decoration-break in css3 -- due 2014-03-06
   -- OPEN

   <trackbot>
   [15]http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/actions/271


     [15] http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/actions/271


   nigel: I've done the action but had no response.

   glenn: I have an update because it was on the agenda in
   yesterday's CSSWG meeting. I had independently submitted a
   request from Cox to move it into Level 3.
   ... After a fair amount of discussion it was decided to leave
   it where it is now in the CSS Fragmentation spec on the basis
   that the group believes it will move to Rec in about
   ... the same timeframe as background and borders level 3.
   There's concern over delays to this: backgrounds and borders L3
   is further along the process. But most of the group
   ... believes it's more logically associated with Fragmentation,
   so this is probably the best place for it.
   ... Peter Linss yesterday was supposed to draft a response.
   When this happens we should thank them and say we'll hold them
   to publishing Fragmentation on an expedited schedule
   ... aligned with the schedule for Backgrounds and Borders.

   close action-271

   <trackbot> Closed action-271.

Issues discussed over the last week

   issue-300?

   <trackbot> issue-300 -- Prior interpretation of the correct
   fallback for tts:origin -- open

   <trackbot>
   [16]http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/issues/300


     [16] http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/issues/300


   no comments on the issues on the agenda from those present

Change Proposals

   [17]https://www.w3.org/wiki/TTML/changeProposal015


     [17] https://www.w3.org/wiki/TTML/changeProposal015


   nigel: I edited the box-decoration-break section to reference
   the EBU-TT-D syntax.

   glenn: I wouldn't be averse to introducing a linePadding style
   property that maps to CSS box-decoration-break. It gives us
   some logical independence for mapping purposes.

   <glenn> ACTION: glenn to add notes to CP15 for those items that
   have already been implemented, where notes point at relevant
   change set [recorded in
   [18]http://www.w3.org/2014/03/06-tt-minutes.html#action01]

   <trackbot> Created ACTION-272 - Add notes to cp15 for those
   items that have already been implemented, where notes point at
   relevant change set [on Glenn Adams - due 2014-03-13].

   nigel: for box-decoration-break need to add example syntax in
   TTML2 and proposed mapping to CSS. Will do this for a single
   value for both start and end, in units identical to those that
   padding takes now.
   ... multiple row alignment

   glenn: want to think about the name, but not expose the CSS
   directly. Prefer to have a TTML property that focuses on the
   usage.

   nigel: agreed. FIts with the general style of TTML.

   glenn: The indirection may reduce spec-dependencies on
   publication. We don't know when flex will get to Rec. If the
   mapping document has dependencies on CSS features that are not
   in Rec we could
   ... put the mapping document outside TTML2 to allow us to
   publish.

AOB

   thierry: administrative point: next week US switches to summer
   time.

   action nigel to add DST note to next agenda

   <trackbot> Created ACTION-273 - Add dst note to next agenda [on
   Nigel Megitt - due 2014-03-13].

   rrsagent. make logs public

Summary of Action Items

   [NEW] ACTION: glenn to add notes to CP15 for those items that
   have already been implemented, where notes point at relevant
   change set [recorded in
   [19]http://www.w3.org/2014/03/06-tt-minutes.html#action01]

   [End of minutes]
     __________________________________________________________


    Minutes formatted by David Booth's [20]scribe.perl version
    1.138 ([21]CVS log)
    $Date: 2014-03-06 15:52:32 $
     __________________________________________________________

     [20] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm

     [21] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/






----------------------------

http://www.bbc.co.uk

This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated.
If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system.
Do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender immediately.
Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received.
Further communication will signify your consent to this.

---------------------

Received on Thursday, 6 March 2014 15:58:59 UTC