Re: ISSUE-326: definitions do not use shall, uses of definitions may use shall [TTML IMSC 1.0] from Pierre-Anthony Lemieux on 2014-07-28 (public-tt@w3.org from July 2014)

From: Pierre-Anthony Lemieux <pal@sandflow.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 15:54:44 +0200
To: Timed Text Working Group <public-tt@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CAF_7JxAYVUUb3QUgsKkBqug2PeCV+-rgRb7JjaxGtX0BM-2Ndg@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Glenn et al.,

Please find at [1] a revised drafted intended to address ISSUE-326.

[1] https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ttml/diff/344c1e426b5a820a322420c10568deb0daf4030a/ttml-ww-profiles/ttml-ww-profiles.html

Best,

-- Pierre

On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 4:27 PM, Timed Text Working Group Issue
Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote:
> ISSUE-326: definitions do not use shall, uses of definitions may use shall [TTML IMSC 1.0]
>
> http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/issues/326
>
> Raised by: Glenn Adams
> On product: TTML IMSC 1.0
>
> In Section 4.4, the second paragraph is a definition of a correspondence (a mapping). It must not use 'shall'. If there is intended to be mandatory behavior that involves use of this definition, e.g., on content or on a processor, then such content/processor usage/behavior should be made explicit in a separate statement of requirement.
>
>
>

Received on Monday, 28 July 2014 13:55:33 UTC