- From: Nigel Megitt <nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk>
- Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 13:21:53 +0000
- To: Timed Text Working Group <public-tt@w3.org>
All, Those with an interest in accessibility on the web may find this of interest, Kind regards, Nigel On 23/07/2014 14:14, "Shadi Abou-Zahra" <shadi@w3.org> wrote: >Dear Judy, all, > >This is a Transition Request for the First Public Working Draft of >"Developers' Guide to Features of Web Accessibility Evaluation Tools" to >be published by ERT WG. > > >Requested document title: > - Developers' Guide to Features of Web Accessibility Evaluation Tools > > >Requested URI and shortname: > - <http://www.w3.org/TR/WAET/> > > >Estimated publication date: > - Thursday 24 July 2014 > > >Document abstract: >[[ >This document describes features that web authoring and quality >assurance tools can incorporate, so that they support the evaluation of >accessibility requirements, such as those defined by the Web Content >Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0. The main purpose of this document >is to promote awareness of such tool features and to provide >introductory guidance for tool developers on what kind of features they >could provide in future implementations of their tools. This listing of >features could also be used to help compare different types of >evaluation tools, for example during the procurement of such tools. > >The features in scope of this document include capabilities to help >specify, manage, carry out and report the results from web accessibility >evaluations. For example, some of the described features relate to >crawling of websites, interacting with tool users to carry out >semi-automated evaluation, and providing evaluation results in a >machine-readable format. This document does not describe the evaluation >of web content features, which is addressed by WCAG 2.0 and its >supporting documents. > >This document encourages the incorporation of accessibility evaluation >features in all web authoring and quality assurance tools, and the >continued development and creation of different types of web >accessibility evaluation tools. The document does not prioritize nor >require any particular accessibility evaluation feature or specific type >of evaluation tools. It describes features that can be provided by tools >that support fully-automated, semi-automated, and manual web >accessibility evaluation. Following this document can help tool >developers to meet accessibility checking requirements defined by the >Authoring Tool Accessibility Guidelines (ATAG). >]] > > >Status of this Document: >[[ >This 24 July 2014 First Public Working Draft of Developers' Guide to >Features of Web Accessibility Evaluation Tools is intended to be >published and maintained as a W3C Working Group Note after review and >refinement. It provides an initial outline for the format and approach >taken in this document to gather early feedback on it. Some features may >be missing in this first iteration of the document. Suggestions for >additional features to be listed in this document is welcome. > >The Evaluation and Repair Tools Working Group (ERT WG) invites >discussion and feedback on this document by web accessibility evaluation >tool developers, web authoring and quality assurance tool developers, >evaluators, researchers, and others with interest in web accessibility >evaluation tools. In particular, ERT WG is looking for feedback on: > > The format and approach taken in this document; > Features descriptions that are currently missing; > Feedback on the included feature descriptions. > >Please send comments on this Developers' Guide to Features of Web >Accessibility Evaluation Tools document by 15 August 2014 to >public-wai-ert-tools@w3.org (publicly visible mailing list archive). >]] > > >Thanks, > Shadi > >-- >Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/ >Activity Lead, W3C/WAI International Program Office >Evaluation and Repair Tools Working Group (ERT WG) >Research and Development Working Group (RDWG) >
Received on Wednesday, 23 July 2014 13:22:23 UTC