- From: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
- Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 10:39:33 -0600
- To: Nigel Megitt <nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk>
- Cc: Pierre-Anthony Lemieux <pal@sandflow.com>, Timed Text Working Group <public-tt@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CACQ=j+cMMcnhx__=MwgKk0377EPRayAB8apUkbqY1Hx95wd10w@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 4:08 AM, Nigel Megitt <nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk> wrote: > Hi Pierre, > > s/A presented region is a region that satisfies all of the following > conditions are true:/A presented region is a region that satisfies all of > the following conditions: > > Then this is acceptable to me to close Issue-313, as discussed. > > However I note that we haven't resolved whether there is any substantive > difference between 'presented region' in IMSC 1 and 'temporally active > region' in TTML 1 SE. If they are synonymous and as a result of Issue-314 > we add an erratum to TTML 1 SE to define "temporally active region" then > we should modify IMSC 1 to use that term in place of "presented region". > I think they are not synonymous since a temporally active region may not produce any renderable pixels (i.e., not be presented) for a number of reasons, including: - - extent is zero in some dimension - origin is such that region doesn't intersect with root container region - display is none visible is hidden opacity is 1 > Also, I note from §2.3 in [1] that it is both a requirement to define > terms and a good practice ("Good Practice 9" also in [1]) to consolidate > the definitions in a glossary section. I will raise a separate issue that > IMSC 1 needs to meet the requirements of this document and as far as > possible also the good practices. > > Kind regards, > > Nigel > > [1] QA Framework: Specification Guidelines > http://www.w3.org/TR/qaframe-spec/#define-terms-section > > > > On 20/07/2014 23:03, "Pierre-Anthony Lemieux" <pal@sandflow.com> wrote: > > >Hi Nigel, > > > >Please indicate whether the text at [1] resolves your comment per your > >suggestion at [2]. > > > >[1] > > > https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ttml/raw-file/tip/ttml-ww-profiles/ttml-ww-profiles > >.html#presented-region > >[2] http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/issues/313 > > > >Thanks, > > > >-- Pierre > > > >On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 6:03 AM, Timed Text Working Group Issue > >Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote: > >> ISSUE-313 (Presented Region is informative only): Presented Region > >>section is informative only [TTML IMSC 1.0] > >> > >> http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/issues/313 > >> > >> Raised by: Nigel Megitt > >> On product: TTML IMSC 1.0 > >> > >> The definition of Presented Region [1] appears intended to add no > >>information relative to what is in TTML1SE. I suggest making it > >>informative rather than normative. > >> > >> However it does differ in that in TTML1SE temporally active regions > >>with opacity=0 will be included in the intermediate synchronic document > >>construction. Note that TTML1SE does not actually define "temporally > >>active" directly as used in §9.3.2 Intermediate Synchronic Document > >>Construction (though it may be implied by reference to SMIL semantics). > >>Therefore another solution to this issue would therefore be to rephrase > >>in terms of a localised definition of "temporally active" as applied to > >>regions. > >> > >> For example: > >> > >> A region, as defined in [TTML1], is considered temporally active if all > >>of the following conditions are true: > >> ... > >> > >> Arguably this should be captured in an errata to TTML1SE and not needed > >>in IMSC 1.0 at all. > >> > >> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/ttml-imsc1/#presented-region > >> [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/ttml1/#semantics-region-layout-step-1 > >> > >> > >> > > >
Received on Monday, 21 July 2014 16:40:22 UTC