- From: Nigel Megitt <nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk>
- Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 16:20:48 +0000
- To: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>, TTWG <public-tt@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <D01935A8.102B1%nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk>
Thanks for the heads-up Glenn. It looks like these bits: http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/WD-media-accessibility-reqs-20140814/#captioning and http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/WD-media-accessibility-reqs-20140814/#enhanced-captions-subtitles are particularly relevant to us. Would anyone object to adopting those requirements as a subset of the requirements that TTML 2 and IMSC 1 should be measured against when assessing their conformance when it comes to LC/CR as per the process for publishing Recommendations (either the old or the new process)? Kind regards, Nigel From: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com<mailto:glenn@skynav.com>> Date: Tuesday, 19 August 2014 16:59 To: TTWG <public-tt@w3.org<mailto:public-tt@w3.org>> Subject: FYI - Media Accessibility User Requirements WD Resent-From: <public-tt@w3.org<mailto:public-tt@w3.org>> Resent-Date: Tuesday, 19 August 2014 17:00 Media Accessibility User Requirements Working Draft Updated 14 August 2014 | Archive http://www.w3.org/blog/news/archives/4024 The Protocols and Formats Working Group (PFWG) today published an updated Working Draft of "Media Accessibility User Requirements," a planned W3C Working Group Note. This document describes the accessibility requirements of people with disabilities with respect to audio and video on the Web, particularly in the context of HTML5. It explains alternative content technologies that people use to get audio and video content, and how these fit in the larger picture of accessibility, both technically within a web user agent and from a production process point of view. Learn more about the Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI). http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/ http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/WD-media-accessibility-reqs-20140814/ http://www.w3.org/WAI/
Received on Tuesday, 19 August 2014 16:21:18 UTC