public-tt@w3.org from August 2014 by date

Wednesday, 27 August 2014

• ISSUE-341: ambiguous definition for determination of descendant region identifier [TTML 1.0] Timed Text Working Group Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-340 (profile designator clarification): Make clear that the use of the ttp:profile attribute is not required. [TTML IMSC 1.0] Timed Text Working Group Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-339 (allow #overflow): Allow the use of #overflow [TTML IMSC 1.0] Timed Text Working Group Issue Tracker

Tuesday, 26 August 2014

• ISSUE-338: inconsistent implicit duration of singleton span in sequential container [TTML 1.0] Timed Text Working Group Issue Tracker

Thursday, 21 August 2014

• RE: EBU liaison re IMSC 1 timeline De Jong, Frans
• {minutes} TTWG Meeting 21/8/2014 Nigel Megitt
• Re: ISSUE-310 (progressivelyDecodable needs hierarchical definition): Forward reference rule doesn't take into account child elements [TTML IMSC 1.0] Glenn Adams
• Re: ISSUE-310 (progressivelyDecodable needs hierarchical definition): Forward reference rule doesn't take into account child elements [TTML IMSC 1.0] Pierre-Anthony Lemieux

Wednesday, 20 August 2014

• {agenda} TTWG Meeting 21/8/2014 Nigel Megitt
• Re: Timed Text Working Group F2F Geneva 16-17 September 2014 Pierre-Anthony Lemieux

Tuesday, 19 August 2014

• Re: FYI - Media Accessibility User Requirements WD Pierre-Anthony Lemieux
• Re: FYI - Media Accessibility User Requirements WD Nigel Megitt
• Re: FYI - Media Accessibility User Requirements WD Pierre-Anthony Lemieux
• Re: FYI - Media Accessibility User Requirements WD Glenn Adams
• Re: FYI - Media Accessibility User Requirements WD Nigel Megitt
• Re: FYI - Media Accessibility User Requirements WD Pierre-Anthony Lemieux
• Re: FYI - Media Accessibility User Requirements WD Nigel Megitt
• Re: FYI - Media Accessibility User Requirements WD Nigel Megitt
• Re: FYI - Media Accessibility User Requirements WD Pierre-Anthony Lemieux
• Re: FYI - Media Accessibility User Requirements WD Glenn Adams
• Re: FYI - Media Accessibility User Requirements WD Nigel Megitt
• FYI - Media Accessibility User Requirements WD Glenn Adams
• DECE liaison re IMSC 1 timeline Nigel Megitt
• EBU liaison re IMSC 1 timeline Nigel Megitt
• SMPTE liaison re IMSC 1 timeline Nigel Megitt

Monday, 18 August 2014

• Timed Text Working Group F2F Geneva 16-17 September 2014 Nigel Megitt

Friday, 15 August 2014

• Re: ISSUE-310 (progressivelyDecodable needs hierarchical definition): Forward reference rule doesn't take into account child elements [TTML IMSC 1.0] Pierre-Anthony Lemieux
• Re: ISSUE-335 (Negative times for offsets): In order to handle offsets between start time in TTML docs and start time in video, allow negative times to be used in fragment begin times. [TTML.next] John Birch
• Re: ISSUE-335 (Negative times for offsets): In order to handle offsets between start time in TTML docs and start time in video, allow negative times to be used in fragment begin times. [TTML.next] Courtney Kennedy
• Re: ISSUE-335 (Negative times for offsets): In order to handle offsets between start time in TTML docs and start time in video, allow negative times to be used in fragment begin times. [TTML.next] Glenn Adams
• Re: ISSUE-335 (Negative times for offsets): In order to handle offsets between start time in TTML docs and start time in video, allow negative times to be used in fragment begin times. [TTML.next] Nigel Megitt
• Re: ISSUE-335 (Negative times for offsets): In order to handle offsets between start time in TTML docs and start time in video, allow negative times to be used in fragment begin times. [TTML.next] Glenn Adams
• Re: ISSUE-335 (Negative times for offsets): In order to handle offsets between start time in TTML docs and start time in video, allow negative times to be used in fragment begin times. [TTML.next] Courtney Kennedy
• Re: ISSUE-310 (progressivelyDecodable needs hierarchical definition): Forward reference rule doesn't take into account child elements [TTML IMSC 1.0] Nigel Megitt
• Re: ISSUE-335 (Negative times for offsets): In order to handle offsets between start time in TTML docs and start time in video, allow negative times to be used in fragment begin times. [TTML.next] Nigel Megitt
• Re: ISSUE-335 (Negative times for offsets): In order to handle offsets between start time in TTML docs and start time in video, allow negative times to be used in fragment begin times. [TTML.next] Courtney Kennedy
• Re: ISSUE-335 (Negative times for offsets): In order to handle offsets between start time in TTML docs and start time in video, allow negative times to be used in fragment begin times. [TTML.next] Nigel Megitt
• ISSUE-337 (Update for TTML2): Update SDP-US for TTML2 [TTML Simple Delivery Profile for Closed Captions (US)] Timed Text Working Group Issue Tracker

Thursday, 14 August 2014

• {minutes} TTWG Meeting 14/8/2014 Nigel Megitt
• ISSUE-336 (aspectRatio syntax): Syntax definition missing from ittp:aspectRatio [TTML IMSC 1.0] Timed Text Working Group Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-335 (Negative times for offsets): In order to handle offsets between start time in TTML docs and start time in video, allow negative times to be used in fragment begin times. [TTML.next] Timed Text Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: ISSUE-310 (progressivelyDecodable needs hierarchical definition): Forward reference rule doesn't take into account child elements [TTML IMSC 1.0] Nigel Megitt
• Re: New Change Proposal 28 on IMSC 1: Profile refactoring Nigel Megitt
• Re: ISSUE-310 (progressivelyDecodable needs hierarchical definition): Forward reference rule doesn't take into account child elements [TTML IMSC 1.0] Pierre-Anthony Lemieux
• Re: ISSUE-310 (progressivelyDecodable needs hierarchical definition): Forward reference rule doesn't take into account child elements [TTML IMSC 1.0] Nigel Megitt
• Re: New Change Proposal 28 on IMSC 1: Profile refactoring Pierre-Anthony Lemieux
• Re: ISSUE-310 (progressivelyDecodable needs hierarchical definition): Forward reference rule doesn't take into account child elements [TTML IMSC 1.0] Pierre-Anthony Lemieux
• Re: ISSUE-310 (progressivelyDecodable needs hierarchical definition): Forward reference rule doesn't take into account child elements [TTML IMSC 1.0] Nigel Megitt
• Re: ISSUE-310 (progressivelyDecodable needs hierarchical definition): Forward reference rule doesn't take into account child elements [TTML IMSC 1.0] Pierre-Anthony Lemieux
• Re: ISSUE-310 (progressivelyDecodable needs hierarchical definition): Forward reference rule doesn't take into account child elements [TTML IMSC 1.0] Nigel Megitt
• Re: ISSUE-310 (progressivelyDecodable needs hierarchical definition): Forward reference rule doesn't take into account child elements [TTML IMSC 1.0] Pierre-Anthony Lemieux
• Re: ISSUE-310 (progressivelyDecodable needs hierarchical definition): Forward reference rule doesn't take into account child elements [TTML IMSC 1.0] Nigel Megitt

Wednesday, 13 August 2014

• Re: Problem with TPAC 2014 Registration Thierry MICHEL
• Re: Problem with TPAC 2014 Registration Thierry MICHEL
• Re: Problem with TPAC 2014 Registration Glenn Adams
• Re: Problem with TPAC 2014 Registration Philippe Le Hegaret
• Re: Problem with TPAC 2014 Registration Thierry MICHEL
• Re: ISSUE-310 (progressivelyDecodable needs hierarchical definition): Forward reference rule doesn't take into account child elements [TTML IMSC 1.0] Pierre-Anthony Lemieux
• {agenda} TTWG Meeting 14/8/2014 Nigel Megitt
• TTML2 timeline (ACTION-309) Nigel Megitt
• Re: ISSUE-334: Misuse of style property characteristics with ttp:progressivelyDecodable [TTML IMSC 1.0] Pierre-Anthony Lemieux
• ISSUE-334: Misuse of style property characteristics with ttp:progressivelyDecodable [TTML IMSC 1.0] Timed Text Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: ISSUE-310 (progressivelyDecodable needs hierarchical definition): Forward reference rule doesn't take into account child elements [TTML IMSC 1.0] Nigel Megitt
• Re: ISSUE-310 (progressivelyDecodable needs hierarchical definition): Forward reference rule doesn't take into account child elements [TTML IMSC 1.0] Glenn Adams
• Re: ISSUE-310 (progressivelyDecodable needs hierarchical definition): Forward reference rule doesn't take into account child elements [TTML IMSC 1.0] Nigel Megitt
• Re: Problem with TPAC 2014 Registration Nigel Megitt
• Problem with TPAC 2014 Registration Glenn Adams
• Re: ISSUE-310 (progressivelyDecodable needs hierarchical definition): Forward reference rule doesn't take into account child elements [TTML IMSC 1.0] Pierre-Anthony Lemieux
• Re: ISSUE-310 (progressivelyDecodable needs hierarchical definition): Forward reference rule doesn't take into account child elements [TTML IMSC 1.0] Nigel Megitt
• Re: ISSUE-310 (progressivelyDecodable needs hierarchical definition): Forward reference rule doesn't take into account child elements [TTML IMSC 1.0] Pierre-Anthony Lemieux
• Re: ISSUE-330 (Is Presented Region a synonym for temporally active region?): Is Presented Region a synonym for temporally active region? [TTML IMSC 1.0] Nigel Megitt
• Re: ISSUE-330 (Is Presented Region a synonym for temporally active region?): Is Presented Region a synonym for temporally active region? [TTML IMSC 1.0] Nigel Megitt

Tuesday, 12 August 2014

• Re: ISSUE-310 (progressivelyDecodable needs hierarchical definition): Forward reference rule doesn't take into account child elements [TTML IMSC 1.0] Pierre-Anthony Lemieux
• Re: ISSUE-311 (Note on progressivelyDecodable): Note on progressivelyDecodable is not a sentence [TTML IMSC 1.0] Pierre-Anthony Lemieux
• Re: ISSUE-330 (Is Presented Region a synonym for temporally active region?): Is Presented Region a synonym for temporally active region? [TTML IMSC 1.0] Pierre-Anthony Lemieux

Monday, 11 August 2014

• RE: Upcoming F2F Attendee Details Michael Dolan
• Re: Upcoming F2F Attendee Details Glenn Adams
• RE: Upcoming F2F Attendee Details Michael Dolan
• Re: Upcoming F2F Attendee Details Nigel Megitt

Saturday, 9 August 2014

• Re: Upcoming F2F Attendee Details Glenn Adams
• Re: Upcoming F2F Attendee Details Thierry MICHEL
• Upcoming F2F Attendee Details Glenn Adams

Friday, 8 August 2014

• Re: Question about ttml times Glenn Adams
• ISSUE-333: use of application default frameRateMultipler, subFrameRate [TTML 1.0] Timed Text Working Group Issue Tracker
• Question about ttml times Courtney Kennedy
• New Change Proposal 28 on IMSC 1: Profile refactoring Nigel Megitt
• Re: {minutes} TTWG Meeting 7/8/2014 Nigel Megitt

Thursday, 7 August 2014

• Re: {minutes} TTWG Meeting 7/8/2014 Glenn Adams
• {minutes} TTWG Meeting 7/8/2014 Nigel Megitt
• ISSUE-332 (-): #cellResolution support [TTML IMSC 1.0] Timed Text Working Group Issue Tracker

Wednesday, 6 August 2014

• Re: {agenda} TTWG Meeting 7/8/2014 Pierre-Anthony Lemieux
• {agenda} TTWG Meeting 7/8/2014 Nigel Megitt

Monday, 4 August 2014

• Re: ACTION-318: Draft note wording for imsc conformance Pierre-Anthony Lemieux
• Re: ACTION-318: Draft note wording for imsc conformance Nigel Megitt

Saturday, 2 August 2014

• Re: ACTION-318: Draft note wording for imsc conformance Pierre-Anthony Lemieux
• Re: ISSUE-331 (forcedDisplay region background note): An advisory note on the use of backgrounds on regions in combination with forcedDisplay [TTML IMSC 1.0] Pierre-Anthony Lemieux

Friday, 1 August 2014

• Re: ISSUE-331 (forcedDisplay region background note): An advisory note on the use of backgrounds on regions in combination with forcedDisplay [TTML IMSC 1.0] Glenn Adams
• Re: ISSUE-331 (forcedDisplay region background note): An advisory note on the use of backgrounds on regions in combination with forcedDisplay [TTML IMSC 1.0] Glenn Adams
• Re: ISSUE-331 (forcedDisplay region background note): An advisory note on the use of backgrounds on regions in combination with forcedDisplay [TTML IMSC 1.0] Glenn Adams
• Re: ISSUE-331 (forcedDisplay region background note): An advisory note on the use of backgrounds on regions in combination with forcedDisplay [TTML IMSC 1.0] Pierre-Anthony Lemieux
• Re: ISSUE-331 (forcedDisplay region background note): An advisory note on the use of backgrounds on regions in combination with forcedDisplay [TTML IMSC 1.0] Glenn Adams
• Re: ISSUE-331 (forcedDisplay region background note): An advisory note on the use of backgrounds on regions in combination with forcedDisplay [TTML IMSC 1.0] Nigel Megitt
• Re: ISSUE-331 (forcedDisplay region background note): An advisory note on the use of backgrounds on regions in combination with forcedDisplay [TTML IMSC 1.0] Pierre-Anthony Lemieux
• Re: ISSUE-331 (forcedDisplay region background note): An advisory note on the use of backgrounds on regions in combination with forcedDisplay [TTML IMSC 1.0] Glenn Adams
• Re: ACTION-318: Draft note wording for imsc conformance Glenn Adams
• Re: ISSUE-331 (forcedDisplay region background note): An advisory note on the use of backgrounds on regions in combination with forcedDisplay [TTML IMSC 1.0] Glenn Adams
• Re: ACTION-318: Draft note wording for imsc conformance Nigel Megitt
• Re: ISSUE-331 (forcedDisplay region background note): An advisory note on the use of backgrounds on regions in combination with forcedDisplay [TTML IMSC 1.0] Nigel Megitt
• Re: ISSUE-331 (forcedDisplay region background note): An advisory note on the use of backgrounds on regions in combination with forcedDisplay [TTML IMSC 1.0] Glenn Adams
• Re: ACTION-318: Draft note wording for imsc conformance Glenn Adams
• ISSUE-331 (forcedDisplay region background note): An advisory note on the use of backgrounds on regions in combination with forcedDisplay [TTML IMSC 1.0] Timed Text Working Group Issue Tracker
• ACTION-318: Draft note wording for imsc conformance Nigel Megitt
• ACTION-315 and ACTION-317 Pierre-Anthony Lemieux

Last message date: Wednesday, 27 August 2014 23:59:09 UTC