Re: New Features and CSS Compatibility

It's true that we should aim for CSS mapping, however we are not constrained only to include features with a CSS mapping (or indeed an XSL-FO mapping). Additionally I believe we have the option to request functionality from the CSS group if existing CSS functionality cannot meet our requirements.


On 05/11/2013 01:10, "Glenn Adams" <glenn@skynav.com<mailto:glenn@skynav.com>> wrote:

For anyone suggesting a new feature in TTML, e.g., shrink text to fit region, it won't be of much benefit to do so if there isn't an existing CSS mapping, or at least not much benefit in the open web platform (native presentation processors can do what they want).

So before you consider proposing something that has no CSS mapping, think first about how to get it into CSS.



----------------------------

http://www.bbc.co.uk

This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated.
If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system.
Do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender immediately.
Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received.
Further communication will signify your consent to this.

---------------------