- From: Michael Jordan <mijordan@adobe.com>
- Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 12:53:13 -0700
- To: "'public-tt@w3.org'" <public-tt@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CDBA629C.2EC43%mijordan@adobe.com>
Some notes regarding proposed updates to charter : http://www.w3.org/2013/05/timed-text-charter.html 1. In the mission statement, the phrase "based on implementation experience and interoperability feedback" is too detailed to include in the mission and gets into the "how." 2. Under Scope : * Change wording of "Such formats MUST be useable for online media captioning, described video (aka video/audio description) and should address the media accessibility user requirements<http://www.w3.org/TR/media-accessibility-reqs/>." to "Such formats MUST support requirements for online media captioning, described video (aka video/audio description) and must address the media accessibility user requirements<http://www.w3.org/TR/media-accessibility-reqs/>." * When does "broadcast production" end? The term is used vaguely here.. * " Publish a Recommendation for a new Timed Text Markup Language (TTML) 1.1 specification to include the Note described above." What is the note referenced in this sentence? * "The Group is expected to produce annual updates for the Recommendation with previously specified but now newly supported features by browser vendors." This should be a separate deliverable, "Annual recommendation updates…" * "Establish a semantic mapping between TTML and WebVTT in order to facilitate browser implementation and market adoption." Per our discussion on this morning's call, the idea of a direct semantic mapping between TTML and WebVTT may not be as desirable as a mapping of both semantic structures to a common object model, which can be used to translate cues from either source to HTML5 and CSS. * Should wrapping up the TTML 1.0 Second Edition come before the new TTML 1.1 specification in the scope list? 3. Under Liaisons with W3C Groups. Should we liaise with the group working on Encrypted Media Extensions or is that be covered under our HTML Working Group dependency? 4. Should browser vendors be included under External Groups? On 5/15/13 1:03 PM, "Sean Hayes" <Sean.Hayes@microsoft.com<mailto:Sean.Hayes@microsoft.com>> wrote: our teleconference is scheduled with reference to Boston Time, the correct time of this teleconference in your locale may change. Please check http://timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?month=05&day=15&year=2013&hour=10&min=0&sec=0&p1=43 Thursdays 10:00am-11:00am Boston local Zakim Bridge +1.617.761.6200, conference 8865 ("TTML") IRC: server: irc.w3.org, port: 6665, channel: #tt Web gateway to :http://www.w3.org/2001/01/cgi-irc Chair: Sean Hayes Agenda+ Assign Scribe Agenda+ Proposed updates to charter : http://www.w3.org/2013/05/timed-text-charter.html Agenda+ Progress on publication of SE Agenda+ HTML5 mapping (now as change proposal [1]) Agenda+ Approval of 1.1 Change proposals [2] and [3]. AOB Tracker (Issues and Actions): http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker Profile draft: http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ttml/raw-file/tip/ttml10-sdp-us Change proposals: [1] http://www.w3.org/wiki/TTML/changeProposal005 [2] http://www.w3.org/wiki/TTML/changeProposal001 [2] http://www.w3.org/wiki/TTML/changeProposal002 TTML Wiki http://www.w3.org/wiki/TimedText Second edition draft: https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ttml/raw-file/tip/ttml10/spec/ttaf1-dfxp.html?content-type=text/html%3bcharset=utf-8
Received on Thursday, 16 May 2013 19:55:34 UTC