RE: TTML Agenda for 15/05/13

Your agenda says: "Approval of....", hence my advance concern.  Plans are
good.

Re Proposal #2 (in addition to the AI I thought Glenn still had about flow):

Although there was email discussion about them being anonymous regions, how
is that inferred from the proposal language? Even if it is normatively
inferred, it might be good to informatively note that explicitly as it is
crucial to understanding the basic behavior.

What styles do they inherit?  I think the styles would need to be inherited
from the "current" region, not the styles from the near-proximity parent
elements.  More on this and other things in the attached email from last
summer, which I don't recall resolution on.

Unrelated, can we add an agenda item to accept the old liaison requests from
SMPTE and thus enable work on specific proposals?

	Mike

-----Original Message-----
From: Sean Hayes [mailto:Sean.Hayes@microsoft.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2013 11:09 AM
To: Michael Dolan; public-tt@w3.org
Subject: RE: TTML Agenda for 15/05/13

Yes CP5 is not up for approval at this time, I only wrote it today as per my
AI form last week; so I'll just be going over whats there.

CP 1 & 2 have been out there for a long time and no discussion, so we need
to make progress on them it's not so much that I expect to approve them this
week, although that would be nice, but more that I want to know specifically
what the action plan is for doing so.

As to the defined behavior, I believe the mapping is well defined to
intermediate anonymous region, so that the text flow issues are as well
defined as text flows are in any region however I will go back and check
that in advance of the discussion tomorrow.

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Dolan [mailto:mdolan@newtbt.com]
Sent: 15 May 2013 18:59
To: public-tt@w3.org
Subject: RE: TTML Agenda for 15/05/13

Some advance thoughts:

1. Proposal 1 (extension to set) is OK with me.

2. Proposal 2 (origin and extent semantics for <p>) - although I am
cautiously supportive of exploring this, I thought we previously agreed that
it is still lacking defined behavior for how text would flow within the
region, including wrap behavior, as well as the behavior of CR, LF and TAB
when content is randomly placed like this.  I think flow examples would be
needed just to better understand the ramifications, as this will be complex.
An alternative might be to define a non-flow region? (Just an idea - the use
cases that this addresses do not generally involve "rollup" captions).  A
minor comment on the first bullet of the "Impact" - the fact that there are
attributes that have no semantic meaning on some elements is a very general
issue and therefore the fact that the XML schema (properly) represents the
permitted syntaxes on <p> is not really relevant or specific to the affected
element and attributes. Suggest it be deleted. 

3. Proposal 5 - Although we discussed this generally, I don't recall seeing
these details before. I'm not opposed, but it seems like it would be
premature to approve it tomorrow.

Regards,

	Mike

-----Original Message-----
From: Sean Hayes [mailto:Sean.Hayes@microsoft.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2013 10:04 AM
To: 'public-tt@w3.org'
Subject: TTML Agenda for 15/05/13


our teleconference is scheduled with reference to Boston Time, the correct
time of this teleconference in your locale may change. Please check
http://timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?month=05&day=15&year=2013&h
our=10&min=0&sec=0&p1=43  

Thursdays 10:00am-11:00am Boston local

 Zakim Bridge +1.617.761.6200, conference 8865 ("TTML")
IRC: server: irc.w3.org, port: 6665, channel: #tt Web gateway to
:http://www.w3.org/2001/01/cgi-irc


Chair: Sean Hayes

Agenda+ Assign Scribe

Agenda+ Proposed updates to charter :
http://www.w3.org/2013/05/timed-text-charter.html

Agenda+ Progress on publication of SE

Agenda+ HTML5 mapping (now as change proposal [1])

Agenda+ Approval of 1.1 Change proposals [2] and [3].

AOB

Tracker (Issues and Actions): http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker
Profile draft:  http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ttml/raw-file/tip/ttml10-sdp-us

Change proposals:
[1] http://www.w3.org/wiki/TTML/changeProposal005
[2] http://www.w3.org/wiki/TTML/changeProposal001
[2] http://www.w3.org/wiki/TTML/changeProposal002 


TTML Wiki
http://www.w3.org/wiki/TimedText

Second edition draft: 

https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ttml/raw-file/tip/ttml10/spec/ttaf1-dfxp.html?content
-type=text/html%3bcharset=utf-8