- From: Michael Dolan <mdolan@newtbt.com>
- Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 00:53:19 -0700
- To: <public-tt@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <001301ce730b$7693df40$63bb9dc0$@newtbt.com>
Regrets for today. See below for specifics. In general, we need to put 1.0SE behind us and get on promptly with 1.1. From: Sean Hayes [mailto:Sean.Hayes@microsoft.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2013 5:01 PM To: 'public-tt@w3.org' Subject: TTML Agenda for 26/06/13 our teleconference is scheduled with reference to Boston Time, the correct time of this teleconference in your locale may change. Please check http://timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?month=06 <http://timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?month=06&day=26&year=2013& hour=10&min=0&sec=0&p1=43> &day=26&year=2013&hour=10&min=0&sec=0&p1=43 Thursdays 10:00am-11:00am Boston local Zakim Bridge +1.617.761.6200, conference 8865 ("TTML") IRC: server: irc.w3.org, port: 6665, channel: #tt Web gateway to :http://www.w3.org/2001/01/cgi-irc Chair: Sean Hayes Agenda+ Assign Scribe Agenda+ Close out Issues and Actions pending review Agenda+ ISSUE 200 https://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/issues/200 OK Agenda+ ISSUE 209 https://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/issues/209 OK Agenda+ ISSUE 211 https://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/issues/211 I guess this is technically precise, but a general source of user confusion and errors are the broad syntax permitted in TTML that has no semantic meaning. This is an example, where a wide range of values are syntactically permitted, but only a smaller range is semantically meaningful - in this case unconditionally clamped. It would be a lot better if the spec and schema actually forbid values that have no meaning. I anticipate the response will be that the syntax is aligned with other W3C spec X, but well. See also 222. Agenda+ ISSUE 212 https://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/issues/212 OK Agenda+ ISSUE 214 https://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/issues/214 OK Agenda+ ISSUE 215 https://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/issues/215 OK Agenda+ ISSUE 216 https://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/issues/216 OK Agenda+ ISSUE 218 https://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/issues/218 OK Agenda+ ISSUE 219 https://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/issues/219 OK Agenda+ ISSUE 220 https://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/issues/220 OK Agenda+ ISSUE 221 https://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/issues/221 OK Agenda+ ISSUE 222 https://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/issues/222 See 211. Agenda+ ISSUE 223 https://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/issues/223 OK Agenda+ ISSUE 251 https://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/issues/251 OK Agenda+ ISSUE 252 https://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/issues/252 OK Agenda+ ISSUE 256 https://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/issues/256 OK Agenda+ ISSUE 257 https://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/issues/257 OK Agenda+ ISSUE 258 https://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/issues/258 OK, but this is not editorial and thus question its application to 1.0SE. Tracker (Issues and Actions): <http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker> http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker TTML 1.0 ED https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ttml/raw-file/default/ttml10/spec/ttaf1-dfxp.html TTML Wiki <http://www.w3.org/wiki/TimedText> http://www.w3.org/wiki/TimedText Second edition draft: <https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ttml/raw-file/tip/ttml10/spec/ttaf1-dfxp.html?conten t-type=text/html%3bcharset=utf-8> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ttml/raw-file/tip/ttml10/spec/ttaf1-dfxp.html?content -type=text/html%3bcharset=utf-8
Received on Thursday, 27 June 2013 07:54:22 UTC