Re: A new proposal for how to deal with text track cues

Incidentally, for those that are interested: the proposal was written
as a resolution proposal to this bug
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=21851#c21 , taking the
last proposal given in the bug a step further.

Best Regards,
Silvia.

On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 10:45 PM, Silvia Pfeiffer
<silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Glenn,
>
> Since the proposal makes changes to the HTML spec and the WebVTT spec,
> I see the HTML WG and the TTCG as primary places for doing this work.
>
> However, input from the TTWG would be highly appreciated since I
> believe there is work going on here that may lead to the specification
> of a TTMLCue object that would need to fit into the text track cue
> hierarchy that is under discussion.
>
> The changes that I am proposing will prepare HTML better for the
> introduction of TTMLCue.
>
> Please take your time to review my proposal and I look forward to your
> technical feedback and the discussion about it in this forum, which I
> would value highly.
>
> Best Regards,
> Silvia.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 10:37 PM, Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com> wrote:
>> Silvia,
>>
>> At first order, we need to resolve a major process issue, namely, where to
>> do this work. I doubt if I'm alone in thinking that the HTML ML or WG is not
>> the right place.
>>
>> G.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 8:31 PM, Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I would appreciate any technical input, in particular seeing as Sean
>>> is preparing for TTML to be parsed into HTML cues. I believe this new
>>> proposal is more suited to a common approach to for TTML and WebVTT.
>>>
>>> Best Regards,
>>> Silvia.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 7:49 PM, Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com> wrote:
>>> > TTWG members should take a look at and respond to [1]. I have already
>>> > made a
>>> > meager, albeit non-technical response [2].
>>> >
>>> > [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2013Jun/0037.html
>>> > [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2013Jun/0040.html
>>
>>

Received on Wednesday, 12 June 2013 12:48:48 UTC