TTML.next - Version, Short Name from Glenn Adams on 2013-07-11 (public-tt@w3.org from July 2013)

From: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 18:20:03 -0600
To: public-tt <public-tt@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CACQ=j+dzCpFTGaGUKTfHt+nc_Sn9fuVD0U9EvessXHw6_c6uPA@mail.gmail.com>

What version do we want to use for TTML.next? 1.1? 2.0? I'm happy with 1.1
because I expect it to be backwards compatible with 1.0. However, TTML2
sounds more bright and shiny than TTML1.1. What do folks think?

Do we want to change the short-name from ttaf1-dfxp to ttml11 or ttml2 or
X? I'm using ttml11 as the short name in the current draft. We first need
to resolve the version question above and then request the team to approve
a new short name.

Received on Thursday, 11 July 2013 00:20:50 UTC