- From: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
- Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 13:59:15 -0800
- To: "public-tt@w3.org" <public-tt@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 4 February 2013 21:59:51 UTC
On Feb 3, 2013, at 23:57 , David Ronca <dronca@netflix.com> wrote: > >Now in so much as the root container defines the coordinate system, then I believe the most > >general system is one that aligns top left 0,0 with 0,0 of the underlying media, and X,Y > >with the bottom right of the media. Since X and Y can be any real value, it doesn't really > > matter what value we use so 100%,100% seems adequate. If we then allow negative values and > >values beyond 100, we can address any relative position. > > Following this model, if the media is 16:9 but the captions were done using CEA-608 (or another format that uses/assumed a 4:3 presentation), Hang on, we were talking about pixel aspect ratio before. 16:9 and 4:3 are picture aspect ratios. But even so, why are we hypothesizing that someone has the energy etc. to re-author the video, but can't adjust the TTML region in which they want the captions displayed? David Singer Multimedia and Software Standards, Apple Inc.
Received on Monday, 4 February 2013 21:59:51 UTC