RE: Regarding publishing SDP-US as a Note vs Rec

Yes, there are differences in the extent of the profiling, but conversely it would be easy to make an equally extensive application-independent profile.

 

I guess I don’t feel strongly about which approach we take. But we should come up with a way to ensure the separate documents are easily discoverable – perhaps an informative reference from the core spec or something.

 

                Mike

 

From: Glenn Adams [mailto:glenn@skynav.com] 
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2012 7:40 PM
To: Michael Dolan
Cc: public-tt@w3.org
Subject: Re: Regarding publishing SDP-US as a Note vs Rec

 

those profiles are neutral to application, while this one is not; in addition, this one goes beyond TTML into other player environment constraints, e.g., end user style overrides; plus this one is region specific; i'd prefer to segregate the region/application neutral part and its region/application-specific profiles; plus there is an issue of maintenance and versioning, which is harder if they were integrated

On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 12:49 PM, Michael Dolan <mdolan@newtbt.com> wrote:

I’m not sure I see the fundamental difference between a (more detailed) profile defined in SDP-US and the current (crisp feature) profiles already defined in TTML Appendix F.