- From: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
- Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 09:40:39 +0800
- To: Kouichi Uchimura <Kouichi.Uchimura@jp.sony.com>
- Cc: "public-tt@w3.org" <public-tt@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 24 August 2012 01:41:26 UTC
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 9:23 AM, Kouichi Uchimura < Kouichi.Uchimura@jp.sony.com> wrote: > Yes. I can understand your comment., that is the answer I was looking > for. > And can agree to you. > Processers will have such values internally > if implementers understand this correctly. > basically, TTML uses the same terminology and semantics for style property resolution as does CSS and XSL-FO, both of which are normatively referenced by TTML, and to which semantics we refer multiple times; as such, we had not thought it necessary to repeat the terminology and semantics from CSS and XSL-FO in the prose of TTML; the only exception is in section 8.4 in that we attempted to be more explicit about style resolution that was the case in CSS2; also, this was needed since TTML introduced new mechanisms (referential and chained referential styling) to specify styles by reference which were not present in CSS or XSL-FO;
Received on Friday, 24 August 2012 01:41:26 UTC