Re: New CR - dynamic flow now marked as at risk.

Andrew, Glenn:

I know that you're both busy with other things, but I'd like to issue a plea for one of you to create the dF implementation before the 30-day period expires.  (If NCAM had the funding to do it, I have no doubt that we would.)  There's a huge pool of roll-up broadcast captions that will need to be converted for Web use; without dynamicFlow, DFXP as a whole becomes much less attractive and useful to broadcasters seeking to move captioned content to the Web as easily as possible.  If you can show a workable implementation, I and others in the captioning industry would be grateful.

I'd also like to propose that we open this plea to others in the industry that are already using DFXP and may themselves be able to to create a workable dF implementation.  Unless there are objections, I can write to some contacts to see if they can help.

Geoff/NCAM




On 2/19/10 12:23 PM, "Sean Hayes" <Sean.Hayes@microsoft.com> wrote:

So - hearing no objections, and one vote of approval; this is the plan of record.
Philippe can you  go ahead and issue the new CR.

Thanks,

Sean.


From: public-tt-request@w3.org [mailto:public-tt-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Sean Hayes
Sent: 12 February 2010 16:29
To: public-tt@w3.org
Subject: RE: Meeting notes for 16/10/09

I have not heard of any progress on the dynamic flow implementations which are currently holding up publication. Since we did not identify this at risk in our CR document, we cannot proceed with the current CR without implementation reports on that feature. So my proposal is that, unless I hear to the contrary within one week (silence is consent), I propose to republish TTML as another CR, flagging dynamic flow at risk, for one month. Then if no implementation information is forthcoming, move to PR without dynamic flow after that.

Regards,
Sean.