- From: Sean Hayes <Sean.Hayes@microsoft.com>
- Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 11:07:20 +0100
- To: "Glenn A. Adams" <gadams@xfsi.com>, Geoff Freed <geoff_freed@wgbh.org>, Public TTWG List <public-tt@w3.org>
Informative text is fine by me. I just didn't want a value seemingly plucked out of nowhere. Sean Hayes Media Accessibility Strategist Accessibility Business Unit Microsoft Office: +44 118 909 5867, Mobile: +44 7875 091385 -----Original Message----- From: Glenn A. Adams [mailto:gadams@xfsi.com] Sent: 16 May 2009 4:41 AM To: Geoff Freed; Sean Hayes; Public TTWG List Subject: Re: ISSUE-101 (rollup interval): aribitrary interval for rollup needs justification [DFXP 1.0 (Editorial)] if we retain the same definition for "rollUp", then it would better to document he origin of the value in informative text (i.e., a note), rather than in normative prose; On 5/15/09 8:28 PM, "Geoff Freed" <geoff_freed@wgbh.org> wrote: > > for section 8.2.7 > (http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-ttaf1-dfxp-20090511/#style-attribute-dynamicFlow > ), paragraph #5: > > "If the value of this attribute is rollUp, then this value is interpreted as a > shorthand value equivalent to out(line,smooth) inter(0.433s). This time > interval is defined by "Closed Caption Decoder Requirements for Analog > Television," page 792 > (http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/cfr_2005/octqtr/47cfr15.119.htm). > > how's that? > > g. > > ________________________________________ > From: Sean Hayes [Sean.Hayes@microsoft.com] > Sent: Friday, May 15, 2009 7:04 AM > To: Geoff Freed; Timed Text Working Group WG > Subject: RE: ISSUE-101 (rollup interval): aribitrary interval for rollup > needs justification [DFXP 1.0 (Editorial)] > > That would be helpful. If you can suggest wording for the spec that would be > even better. > > Sean Hayes > Media Accessibility Strategist > Accessibility Business Unit > Microsoft > > Office: +44 118 909 5867, > Mobile: +44 7875 091385 > > > -----Original Message----- > From: public-tt-request@w3.org [mailto:public-tt-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of > Geoff Freed > Sent: 15 May 2009 11:57 AM > To: Timed Text Working Group WG > Subject: RE: ISSUE-101 (rollup interval): aribitrary interval for rollup needs > justification [DFXP 1.0 (Editorial)] > > > this corresponds to the speed of the scroll of 608 roll-up displays, i > believe. i can look this up if you need me to. > > g. > > ________________________________________ > From: public-tt-request@w3.org [public-tt-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Timed > Text Working Group Issue Tracker [sysbot+tracker@w3.org] > Sent: Friday, May 15, 2009 6:54 AM > To: public-tt@w3.org > Subject: ISSUE-101 (rollup interval): aribitrary interval for rollup needs > justification [DFXP 1.0 (Editorial)] > > ISSUE-101 (rollup interval): aribitrary interval for rollup needs > justification [DFXP 1.0 (Editorial)] > > http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/issues/101 > > Raised by: Sean Hayes > On product: DFXP 1.0 (Editorial) > > In the Proposed 'rollup' shorthand. The 'inter' value of 0.433s needs some > justification or explanantion > > > > > >
Received on Saturday, 16 May 2009 10:08:01 UTC