- From: Geoff Freed <geoff_freed@wgbh.org>
- Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 09:48:51 -0400
- To: Timed Text Working Group WG <public-tt@w3.org>
i agree, but are you talking about this as it relates to B.4.2 Reflow Operation (http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-ttaf1-dfxp-20090511/#flowOperationReflow)? i don't see where the statement below is specified. thanks. g. ________________________________________ From: public-tt-request@w3.org [public-tt-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Timed Text Working Group Issue Tracker [sysbot+tracker@w3.org] Sent: Friday, May 15, 2009 7:14 AM To: public-tt@w3.org Subject: ISSUE-105 (dynamicFlow and noWrap): Interaction between the dynamicFlow feature and the noWrap feature [DFXP 1.0] ISSUE-105 (dynamicFlow and noWrap): Interaction between the dynamicFlow feature and the noWrap feature [DFXP 1.0] http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/issues/105 Raised by: Sean Hayes On product: DFXP 1.0 dynamicFlow of elements smaller than a block seems to be dependant on a reflow operation that will wrap content, otherwise inline level clear units won’t work satisfactorily. I suggest the combination of dynamicFlow with wrapOption=’noWrap’ be prohibited or the semantics clarified in the text.
Received on Friday, 15 May 2009 13:51:59 UTC