- From: Geoff Freed <geoff_freed@wgbh.org>
- Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 07:11:56 -0400
- To: Sean Hayes <Sean.Hayes@microsoft.com>, Timed Text Working Group WG <public-tt@w3.org>
yep; will do this morning. g. ________________________________________ From: Sean Hayes [Sean.Hayes@microsoft.com] Sent: Friday, May 15, 2009 7:04 AM To: Geoff Freed; Timed Text Working Group WG Subject: RE: ISSUE-101 (rollup interval): aribitrary interval for rollup needs justification [DFXP 1.0 (Editorial)] That would be helpful. If you can suggest wording for the spec that would be even better. Sean Hayes Media Accessibility Strategist Accessibility Business Unit Microsoft Office: +44 118 909 5867, Mobile: +44 7875 091385 -----Original Message----- From: public-tt-request@w3.org [mailto:public-tt-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Geoff Freed Sent: 15 May 2009 11:57 AM To: Timed Text Working Group WG Subject: RE: ISSUE-101 (rollup interval): aribitrary interval for rollup needs justification [DFXP 1.0 (Editorial)] this corresponds to the speed of the scroll of 608 roll-up displays, i believe. i can look this up if you need me to. g. ________________________________________ From: public-tt-request@w3.org [public-tt-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Timed Text Working Group Issue Tracker [sysbot+tracker@w3.org] Sent: Friday, May 15, 2009 6:54 AM To: public-tt@w3.org Subject: ISSUE-101 (rollup interval): aribitrary interval for rollup needs justification [DFXP 1.0 (Editorial)] ISSUE-101 (rollup interval): aribitrary interval for rollup needs justification [DFXP 1.0 (Editorial)] http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/issues/101 Raised by: Sean Hayes On product: DFXP 1.0 (Editorial) In the Proposed 'rollup' shorthand. The 'inter' value of 0.433s needs some justification or explanantion
Received on Friday, 15 May 2009 11:13:31 UTC