W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tt@w3.org > May 2009

RE: Next DFXP Draft - WD vs LC?

From: Geoff Freed <geoff_freed@wgbh.org>
Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 05:50:51 -0400
To: "Glenn A. Adams" <gadams@xfsi.com>, Public TTWG List <public-tt@w3.org>
Message-ID: <E36081A12A13F146AC32D7724B0E891219E00E81E8@EXCHCCR.wgbh.org>

is there a minimum amount of time we have to wait after we issue the working draft before moving to a new last call?


From: public-tt-request@w3.org [public-tt-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Glenn A. Adams [gadams@xfsi.com]
Sent: Monday, May 04, 2009 8:39 AM
To: Public TTWG List
Subject: Next DFXP Draft - WD vs LC?

Given the number of both technical and editorial changes that have been made to DFXP, it is my recommendation that we publish a normal WD before attempting a LC. I believe we need sufficient time to perform a good review of the current draft before doing a LC. It is not unlikely that the comment resolution process for a WD will require further changes. Also, given the new profile mechanism, we do not have any implementations that support it (and thus have been tested on it), and the new conformance language requires processors to support this new mechanism.

Received on Tuesday, 5 May 2009 09:53:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:42:58 UTC