- From: geoff freed <geoff_freed@wgbh.org>
- Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 15:07:09 -0500
- To: David Kirby <david.kirby@rd.bbc.co.uk>, public-tt@w3.org
> 4) Test reporting procedure
> (Geoff - anything from reviewing the SVG and SMIL test reports?)
Here's a summary of how test suites are handled by these two groups.
1. SVG 1.1 and SVG Tiny 1.2 Test Suites: http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/wiki/Test_Suite_Overview
The test suite is available in a variety of presentation formats
("harnesses"): HTML <embed> and <object>, and SVG <embed> (1.1.only).
(Users can also download a TAR file of all three harnesses.) Each
test operates in the same manner: an SVG rendering is shown alongside
a PNG representation. Ideally, the action in the SVG will match that
shown in the PNG. Each test also has a summary which briefly
describes the test as well as the expected behavior. An
implementation report (dated 2001) is available at http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/Test/BE-ImpStatus
.
2. SMIL 3.0 Test Suite: http://www.w3.org/2007/SMIL30/testsuite/
The test suites are divided into three types: new 3.0 features, other
3.0 features which were originally introduced in SMIL 2.1, and other
3.0 features that were originally introduced in SMIL 2.0. Each test
contains a link to a source file which describes, among other things,
the expected behavior; and a link to a corresponding SMIL file
itself. An implementation report is available at http://www.w3.org/2007/SMIL30/SMIL30-implementation-result.html
.
geoff
On Nov 13, 2008, at 11:00 AM, David Kirby wrote:
>
> Here's the TT agenda for tomorrow's call. Time will be 10am Eastern,
> 3pm UK, 7am pacific.
>
> I've omitted discussion on 708 as Sean can't join us this week. Let
> me know if you want to add anything else.
>
>
> 1) Review action items
> www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/actions/open
> (both are reminders to Sean)
>
> 2) Implementations
> JW player - any further details to report on this?
>
> 3) Progress with testing
> a) test suite coverage - (more tests from Glenn?)
> b) Problem of regions
> (Geoff - any progress making simplified test files?)
> c) Any other issues arising from the testing?
>
> 4) Test reporting procedure
> (Geoff - anything from reviewing the SVG and SMIL test reports?)
>
> 5) AOB
> EBU "DFXP" review group given go-ahead.
>
>
>
Received on Thursday, 13 November 2008 20:07:55 UTC