- From: Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 14:54:45 +0100
- To: <public-tt@w3.org>
Minutes of TT WG Teleconference on 01/29/04
Attendees
Glenn Adams (XFSI, Chair, Scribe) [GA]
Mike Dolan (invited expert) [MD]
Geoff Freed (WGBH/NCAM, scribe) [GF]
Erik Hodge (RealNetworks) [EH]
David Kirby (BBC) [DK]
Thierry Michel (W3C) [TM]
Dave Singer (Apple) [DS]
Sean Hayes, Microsoft (SH)
************************************************************************
Draft Agenda
************************************************************************
1. Follow-Up on IRI/URI Discussion
[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-tt/2004Jan/0030.html
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-tt/2004Jan/0031.html
2. Techncial Specification Status
3. F2F Agenda Planning
4. Open Action Review
************************************************************************
1. Follow-Up on IRI/URI Discussion
************************************************************************
************************************************************************
2. Technical Specification Status
************************************************************************
************************************************************************
3. F2F Agenda Planning
************************************************************************
* Requirements Document and Reviewing Feedback in order Finalize
Action: [GA] request feedback from public-tt reflector on
requirements
for upcoming meeting.
* review input and thread from Bert Bos' email to public reflector
* Profile Discussion
* [DK] What do we mean by profile?
* [EH] What does CC Profile look like?
* What does Audio Description Profile look like?
* What does Distribution Specific Profiles look like?
* What does a minimum Distribution Profile look like?
* [MD] should minimize profiles
* [SH] a usage style (an authorial intent)
Action: [GA] request input from Rhys Lewis (DIWG) on relevant
DIWG documents that address document profiles.
* [DS] point of a profile is to ensure interoperation of author
and recipient.
* [SH] An elective thing; a sub-schema that says this is what I'm
using. It is a claim from author that it is using only some
subset.
Action: [GA]/[GF] to prepare reading list, printing as necessary
* SYMM Activities
* Plan March F2F Meeting Agenda
Action: [SH] Check on firewall support for F2F.
[GF] Any other equipment beside projector/phone. Will arrange
caption tour. Should go into 114 Western Ave.
Action: [GA] Publish draft agenda with assigned slot times for
topics.
************************************************************************
4. Open Action Review
************************************************************************
Action: [SH] Will investigate use of media queries in this context and
report back.
[SH] thinks this is closed, but will review minutes.
Action: [DS with help of Paul Nelson and Peter Lofting] Write RFC to
register appropriate opentype/truetype font types as MIME media types,
suggest model of "application/font-<font-type-name>", e.g.,
"application/font-truetype".
[DS] weak green light from IETF to do this; will draft I-D.
Action: [GA] Make proposal regarding use of Xlink vocabulary or
"src" attribute.
Remains opens.
Action: [GF] Investigate whether to use IRIs instead of URIs?
Note: XPointer and Namespaces in 1.1 use IRIs?
Remains open pending input from Martin Duerst.
Action: [SH] Investigate use of "role" vs "class" attribute.
[SH] recommends "class". [SH] will review minutes. If "role"
means something different, then may retain that separately.
Will propose resolution for next week's F2F.
Action: [GA] Investigate selection of non-TT vocabulary for
application of style/timing semantics.
Proposed Resolution: Note this as a potential feature in
TT-AF-1-0, to be removed if no use-case scenario is identified.
Action: [GF] Investigate mechanism for cascading
semantics and whether to support cascading on either or both
logical and presentation flowed vocabularies.
Remains open. Remove [GA] from action.
Action: [GA] to package above comments for review by TTWG, then
send to commenters once accepted.
Done previously and reported.
Action: [GA] Draft new requirement on "Integrability"
in general terms that should not impact testing or implementation
requirements.
Remains open.
Action: [GA] incorporate agreed changes into TT-AF-1-0-REQ in
preparation for publishing final W3C Note.
Remains open.
Action: [SH] will review and propose subset of aural parameters
(see R305).
Has reviewed, awaiting documenting proposal.
Action: [TM] get [MD2] on call next wk
Contacted but no response. [GA] to follow-up with second request.
Action: [GA] talk about profiles; add to meeting agenda in Boston
Done.
Action: [All] look over [BB]'s comments for next meeting.
Leave open.
Action: [EH] & [all not coming to f2f]: send to list topics for phone
conversation and available times
Done. [GA] to proposed draft time slots. [EH] can join anytime on Wed;
on Thu is open for noon to 3pm eastern.
************************************************************************
5. Next Meetings
************************************************************************
02/04/04 - F2F - WGBH, Cambridge
02/05/04 - F2F - WGBH, Cambridge
02/06/04 - F2F - WGBH, Cambridge
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
START SUMMARY
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
*** RESOLUTIONS ***
Proposed Resolution: Add note to spec that selection of non-TT vocab
elements is a potential feature in TT-AF-1-0, to be removed if no
use-case scenario is identified.
*** OPEN ACTION ITEMS ***
Action: [SH] Will investigate use of media queries in this context and
report back.
Action: [DS with help of Paul Nelson and Peter Lofting] Write RFC to
register appropriate opentype/truetype font types as MIME media types,
suggest model of "application/font-<font-type-name>", e.g.,
"application/font-truetype".
Action: [GA] Make proposal regarding use of Xlink vocabulary or
"src" attribute.
Action: [GF] Investigate whether to use IRIs instead of URIs?
Note: XPointer and Namespaces in 1.1 use IRIs?
Action: [SH] Investigate use of "role" vs "class" attribute.
Action: [GF] Investigate mechanism for cascading
semantics and whether to support cascading on either or both
logical and presentation flowed vocabularies.
Action: [GA] Draft new requirement on "Integrability"
in general terms that should not impact testing or implementation
requirements.
Action: [GA] incorporate agreed changes into TT-AF-1-0-REQ in
preparation for publishing final W3C Note.
Action: [SH] will review and propose subset of aural parameters
(see R305).
Action: [All] look over [BB]'s comments for next meeting.
*** OPEN ISSUES ***
Issue: Whether to use XLink vocabulary, e.g., as used consistently by
SVG, or use "src" attribute as apparently will be done in XHTML2?
Issue: Whether to use IRIs instead of URIs? Note: XPointer and
Namespaces in 1.1 use IRIs?
Issue: Should we use "class" instead of "role"?
Issue: Probably want to permit in logical content mode the selection of
content based on generic XML features of non-TT namespace descriptive
markup, e.g., for applying style and timing semantics, in which case an
appropriate TT container element shall be implied based on nearest
ancestor TT namespace element.
Issue: Need to think about cascading semantics; how to express, how to
apply, etc. Possibly use CSS semantics here as well.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
END SUMMARY
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Thierry MICHEL
W3C/ERCIM
Received on Tuesday, 9 March 2004 08:55:29 UTC