- From: Glenn A. Adams <glenn@xfsi.com>
- Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2003 15:03:33 -0500
- To: "Chris Lilley" <chris@w3.org>, <public-tt@w3.org>
- Cc: <Johnb@screen.subtitling.com>
> -----Original Message----- > From: Chris Lilley [mailto:chris@w3.org] > Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 2:42 PM > To: public-tt@w3.org; Glenn A. Adams > Cc: Johnb@screen.subtitling.com > Subject: Re: TT and subtitling > > The basic graphical element in SVG is the path. the SVG glyph element > has the exact same attribute as the path has, with the same syntax. So > rendering SVG fonts, once there is support for the most minimal > geometric shapes, is easy. I agree that if there is support for path drawing, then it is easy. However, I think we are far from assuming that TT will mandate support for path drawing. It is in this context that I am thinking that support for an outline rasterizer may be construed as be a significant burden. We shall have to see whether or not we end up with support for svg:path or not. It may be that even support for SVG's Basic Shapes is too much to require on some devices. We may need to handle this through a profiling process. G.
Received on Friday, 31 January 2003 15:03:40 UTC