- From: geoff freed <geoff_freed@wgbh.org>
- Date: 30 Jan 2003 13:32:59 -0500
- To: Jason Terando <jterando@rapidtext.com>, <public-tt@w3.org>, "Glenn A. Adams" <glenn@xfsi.com>, <public-tt-request@w3.org>
Jason said: >I guess where this is going is should TT files include the >ability to address multiple types of consumers in a single/file >stream; or would it be better from a design, implementation and >consumption standpoint to limit each TT file/stream to a single >type of consumer; or to support heterogenous types of consumers >in a single TT file/stream? I think the RealText/QText models of separate streams (for different languages, for example) is preferable to the SAMI model, where everything is held in a single file. And Glenn said >I do have some doubts about whether we should try to support >XDS or other "data tunneling" mechanisms that are found in > 608/708, since, strictly speaking, these are unrelated to >our charter. I agree-- this is out of our current scope. Geoff Freed WGBH/NCAM
Received on Thursday, 30 January 2003 13:34:04 UTC