RE: [public-tt] <none>

Good questions, which I can't answer yet, though I'm sure the
WG will come to an eventual conclusion.
 
I do have some doubts about whether we should try to support
XDS or other "data tunneling" mechanisms that are found in 
608/708, since, strictly speaking, these are unrelated to
our charter.
 
G.

	-----Original Message-----
	From: Jason Terando [mailto:jterando@rapidtext.com] 
	Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 12:43 PM
	To: 'public-tt@w3.org'
	Subject: [public-tt] <none>
	
	

	I guess where this is going is should TT files include the ability to address multiple types of consumers in a single/file stream; or would it be better from a design, implementation and consumption standpoint to limit each TT file/stream to a single type of consumer; or to support heterogenous types of consumers in a single TT file/stream?