- From: Michael A. Dolan <miked@tbt.com>
- Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 11:09:30 -0800
- To: "Timed Text Mailing List (E-mail)" <public-tt@w3.org>
As I read the resolution, it still requires that the authoring formats be translatable into the many streaming formats. It is therefore my assumption that if there is a function in stream encoding X, then it is minimally a candidate for inclusion in the authoring format. The authoring syntax and encoding may be entirely different of course, but the function has a right to be considered such that it is translatable. At 08:55 AM 2/26/2003 -0800, Jason Terando wrote: >Just wondering if I got kicked off the mailing list, or if it went silent >after the TTWG resolutions... > >Since the WG has settled on TT as an authoring format, I was wondering >about a couple of things. Is there a list in progress of "display >attributes" that are going to be supported by TT? Above and beyond the >representation of time notation, which has been debated at length, have >there been any discussions regarding position/coordinate notation, >justification, color/transparency capabilities, etc. The Requirements >document mentions a couple of these things and also mentions EIA-708 sort >of as a "base functionality" (item #23). ----------------------------------------------------- Michael A. Dolan TerraByte Technology (619)445-9070 PO Box 1673 Alpine, CA 91903 USA FAX: (208)545-6564 URL:http://www.tbt.com
Received on Wednesday, 26 February 2003 14:44:48 UTC