RE: SMIL [Point of order] was : Proposal 0.0

Glenn,

> As I have previously said, the *primary* format defined 
> by this group *will* be an XML format. 

I am very happy with that. In my view, TT is something like :

- a concatenation of text strings;
- each text string has a start and end time;
- each text string may have some dynamic behavior in time, such as 
scrolling, colour changes (Karaoke), etc.

So what I think is needed, is to express the above in XML, while using a 
notion of time that needs further discussion. 

Best regards,

Jan 










public-tt@w3.org
Sent by: 
public-tt-request@w3.org
2003-02-12 09:07 PM

 
        To:     "Neil Smith" <neil@fresh-toast.com>
<public-tt@w3.org>
        cc:     (bcc: Jan vanderMeer/EHV/CE/PHILIPS)
        Subject:        RE: SMIL [Point of order] was : Proposal 0.0
        Classification: 





Overruled. There is no "point of order" in this discussion context.

As I have previously said, the *primary* format defined by this group
*will* be an XML format. Others may be defined as well (or may not).

Discussion closed.

G.