- From: Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 12:00:10 +0100
- To: <lists@wiltgen.net>, <public-tt@w3.org>
posted > -----Message d'origine----- > De : public-tt-request@w3.org > [mailto:public-tt-request@w3.org] De la part de lists@wiltgen.net > Envoyé : jeudi 6 février 2003 18:07 > À : public-tt@w3.org > Objet : RE : [Moderator Action] Bugs and TT (was TT and subtitling) > > > > >>> Current multimedia standards (eg SMIL) are generally not > appropriate > >>> for subtitling. > >> > >> That's a tad broad. > > > > I have looked at SMIL and Quicktime and cannot see how to reconcile > > the timing aspects of these standards with the timecode in > an external > > broadcast signal (where the timecode may be discontinuous due to > > advert insertion). Comments please? > > My throw-it-out-there-and-see-what-sticks Proposal 0.0, which > uses the SMIL timing model, illustrates how relative timing > works. The SMIL timing model also supports absolute timing. > > -- Charles Wiltgen > > > > > >
Received on Friday, 7 February 2003 06:00:53 UTC