Re: The 8th TREE CG call

Hi all,


The *9th TREE CG call will be the 8th of November at 14:00 CET*. Mind 
that we will have shifted to winter time then - double check the correct 
time with an hour translator. As per usual, we will keep using the on 
Teams 
<https://teams.microsoft.com/l/meetup-join/19%3Ameeting_NDkwMWZlMzMtM2FjZi00MjZhLTlhZTMtNjAwMjU5Yjc3YWVi%40thread.v2/0?context=%7B%22Tid%22%3A%22a72d5a72-25ee-40f0-9bd1-067cb5b770d4%22%2C%22Oid%22%3A%22074b6191-940e-49de-964e-f2919f3f8501%22%2C%22MessageId%22%3A%220%22%7D> 
link.


Some decisions and action points from today:

  1. We’re going to prepare a PR to rework the README and the examples: 
https://github.com/TREEcg/specification/issues/89 - we’re also going to 
link the TREE CG W3C page to the github https://www.w3.org/community/treecg/

  2. We’re going to reach out to our members that don’t attend confcalls 
to check whether they would like to get more involved, and whether they 
get the current communication. We’re going to reach out to public LOD 
style mailing lists from the moment we’re nearing the 1.0 spec

  3. We reached a consensus on 
https://github.com/TREEcg/specification/issues/88 → the member 
extraction algorithm using shapes MUST ignore quads in graphs equaling 
another member focus node URI in the current context.


We also have had a very interesting discussion, annotated in the slides, 
on issue 85 (graphs vs. trees). We’ll do a bit of homework by the next 
call to further analyze the requirements of a potential solution.


Kind regards,


Pieter



On 25/10/2023 09:47, Pieter Colpaert wrote:
>
> Hi TREE CG Members,
>
>
> Start preparing your coffees because the meeting is in 13 minutes!
>
>
> As promised, a link to the slides: 
> https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1mQ9778_-Xq4BMrBrKyBX7ApAP1nHyec9GwGPCRwPr3w/edit?usp=sharing
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
>
> Pieter
>
>
>
> On 24/10/2023 23:13, Pieter Colpaert wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Tomorrow we’re going to have the 8^th  TREE CG call at 10:00 CET on 
>> Teams 
>> <https://teams.microsoft.com/l/meetup-join/19%3Ameeting_NDkwMWZlMzMtM2FjZi00MjZhLTlhZTMtNjAwMjU5Yjc3YWVi%40thread.v2/0?context=%7B%22Tid%22%3A%22a72d5a72-25ee-40f0-9bd1-067cb5b770d4%22%2C%22Oid%22%3A%22074b6191-940e-49de-964e-f2919f3f8501%22%2C%22MessageId%22%3A%220%22%7D>
>>
>> Agenda
>>  * We decided to do semantic versioning on the spec, yet that didn’t 
>> happen so far
>>  * We will be continuing discussion on #85 
>> <https://github.com/TREEcg/specification/issues/85> 
>> - I will share the slides on this during the call as I’m still trying 
>> to structure the discussion properly
>>  * There’s also a minor change request in how to handle shape 
>> templates with named graphs. See 
>> https://github.com/TREEcg/specification/issues/88
>>
>> Looking forward talking to everyone tomorrow again!
>>
>> Kind regards,
>>
>> Pieter
> -- 
> https://pietercolpaert.be/
> +32486747122

-- 
https://pietercolpaert.be/
+32486747122