- From: Pieter Colpaert <pieter.colpaert@ugent.be>
- Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2023 13:00:19 +0200
- To: public-treecg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <0c1aa8f6-e10e-46e2-a51b-f5d10e134b2f@ugent.be>
Hi all, The *9th TREE CG call will be the 8th of November at 14:00 CET*. Mind that we will have shifted to winter time then - double check the correct time with an hour translator. As per usual, we will keep using the on Teams <https://teams.microsoft.com/l/meetup-join/19%3Ameeting_NDkwMWZlMzMtM2FjZi00MjZhLTlhZTMtNjAwMjU5Yjc3YWVi%40thread.v2/0?context=%7B%22Tid%22%3A%22a72d5a72-25ee-40f0-9bd1-067cb5b770d4%22%2C%22Oid%22%3A%22074b6191-940e-49de-964e-f2919f3f8501%22%2C%22MessageId%22%3A%220%22%7D> link. Some decisions and action points from today: 1. We’re going to prepare a PR to rework the README and the examples: https://github.com/TREEcg/specification/issues/89 - we’re also going to link the TREE CG W3C page to the github https://www.w3.org/community/treecg/ 2. We’re going to reach out to our members that don’t attend confcalls to check whether they would like to get more involved, and whether they get the current communication. We’re going to reach out to public LOD style mailing lists from the moment we’re nearing the 1.0 spec 3. We reached a consensus on https://github.com/TREEcg/specification/issues/88 → the member extraction algorithm using shapes MUST ignore quads in graphs equaling another member focus node URI in the current context. We also have had a very interesting discussion, annotated in the slides, on issue 85 (graphs vs. trees). We’ll do a bit of homework by the next call to further analyze the requirements of a potential solution. Kind regards, Pieter On 25/10/2023 09:47, Pieter Colpaert wrote: > > Hi TREE CG Members, > > > Start preparing your coffees because the meeting is in 13 minutes! > > > As promised, a link to the slides: > https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1mQ9778_-Xq4BMrBrKyBX7ApAP1nHyec9GwGPCRwPr3w/edit?usp=sharing > > > Kind regards, > > > Pieter > > > > On 24/10/2023 23:13, Pieter Colpaert wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Tomorrow we’re going to have the 8^th TREE CG call at 10:00 CET on >> Teams >> <https://teams.microsoft.com/l/meetup-join/19%3Ameeting_NDkwMWZlMzMtM2FjZi00MjZhLTlhZTMtNjAwMjU5Yjc3YWVi%40thread.v2/0?context=%7B%22Tid%22%3A%22a72d5a72-25ee-40f0-9bd1-067cb5b770d4%22%2C%22Oid%22%3A%22074b6191-940e-49de-964e-f2919f3f8501%22%2C%22MessageId%22%3A%220%22%7D> >> >> Agenda >> * We decided to do semantic versioning on the spec, yet that didn’t >> happen so far >> * We will be continuing discussion on #85 >> <https://github.com/TREEcg/specification/issues/85> >> - I will share the slides on this during the call as I’m still trying >> to structure the discussion properly >> * There’s also a minor change request in how to handle shape >> templates with named graphs. See >> https://github.com/TREEcg/specification/issues/88 >> >> Looking forward talking to everyone tomorrow again! >> >> Kind regards, >> >> Pieter > -- > https://pietercolpaert.be/ > +32486747122 -- https://pietercolpaert.be/ +32486747122
Received on Wednesday, 25 October 2023 11:00:30 UTC