- From: Pieter Colpaert <pieter.colpaert@ugent.be>
- Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2023 10:01:34 +0100
- To: "public-treecg@w3.org" <public-treecg@w3.org>
Hi all, Call link for tomorrow at 14:00 CET: https://teams.microsoft.com/_#/l/meetup-join/19:meeting_NDkwMWZlMzMtM2FjZi00MjZhLTlhZTMtNjAwMjU5Yjc3YWVi@thread.v2/0?context=%7B%22Tid%22%3A%22a72d5a72-25ee-40f0-9bd1-067cb5b770d4%22%2C%22Oid%22%3A%22074b6191-940e-49de-964e-f2919f3f8501%22%2C%22MessageId%22%3A%220%22%7D&anon=true&deeplinkId=f7f5ca1a-7b7c-40af-a172-83816933eac9 It would be an amazing end of the year gift if we would be able to make progress tomorrow on the subset relation. We’ll take that as a main point. Reminder of smaller TODOs: * Sander Van Dooren to report on https://github.com/TREEcg/specification/issues/89 * Pieter Colpaert to report on https://github.com/TREEcg/specification/issues/86 and https://github.com/TREEcg/specification/issues/92 (I didn’t do anything on this yet, I hope I find some extra time before tomorrow) Some points we will not be discussing and we will need to tackle in the new year: * Side note on issues #76 and #77: Qualified values were at some point part of the spec - not sure anymore why they were removed, but still seems like an interesting idea to Pieter: https://github.com/TREEcg/specification/commit/d5836991b2450ac4129e0f51c2b036dd405976be * Standardized test suite: https://github.com/TREEcg/specification/issues/97 * Can we remove conditional imports cfr. issue #90? * I’d love to have activity pub and other activitystreams based specs (such as for example event notifications and IIIF Change Discovery) work with TREE clients. Therefore we’ll need to introduce some extra compatibility text on collections. What a productive year for the TREE spec it has been! Looking forward to 2024! Kind regards, Pieter -- https://pietercolpaert.be +32486747122
Received on Tuesday, 19 December 2023 09:01:46 UTC