- From: <noreply@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2025 08:38:29 +0000
- To: public-transition-announce@w3.org
FPWD Request for Verifiable Credential Confidence Method v1.0 - vc-confidence-method from https://github.com/w3c/transitions/issues/748 # Document title, URLs, estimated publication date - Verifiable Credential Confidence Method v1.0 - Editors' draft: https://w3c.github.io/vc-confidence-method/ - Requested short name: vc-confidence-method - Expected publication date: 2025-10-30 - Final Draft: - https://www.w3.org/TR/vc-confidence-method/ - https://www.w3.org/TR/2025/WD-vc-confidence-method-20251030/ # Abstract - https://w3c.github.io/vc-confidence-method/#abstract # Status - https://w3c.github.io/vc-confidence-method/#sotd # Is it a delta specification intended to become a W3C Recommendation? No # Link to group's decision to request transition https://w3c.github.io/vc-wg/minutes/2025-10-08.html#d9dd # IPR commitments * https://www.w3.org/community/credentials/spec/287/commitments * https://www.w3.org/groups/wg/vc/ipr/ # Issues - https://github.com/w3c/vc-confidence-method/issues/ # Information about implementations known to the Working Group There are four implementations known to the Working Group at this time (MIT Digital Credentials Consortium, Digital Bazaar, MOSIP, and Government of Singapore) with a commitment to achieve interoperability once the test suite has been created. # Note The Working Group is currently in Maintenance mode; this usually means that the WG is not chartered to bring new features to Recommendation. ***HOWEVER***, in the case of this Working Group, the charter explicitly made an exception for a few cases, including this one. See bullet item on reserved extensions in [the scope section of the charter](https://www.w3.org/2024/10/vc-wg-charter.html#scope). cc @brentzundel @philarcher @jandrieu @msporny @denkeni -- This email was generated automatically using https://github.com/w3c/transition-issues-bot
Received on Monday, 20 October 2025 08:38:34 UTC