- From: Aleecia M. McDonald <aleecia@aleecia.com>
- Date: Sat, 12 May 2018 18:40:45 -0700
- To: "public-tracking@w3.org (public-tracking@w3.org) (public-tracking@w3.org)" <public-tracking@w3.org>
Forgive me Mike, I’m about to derail the thread for a second. In starting to read this I noticed that in 5.1, we no longer say a general purpose user agent must not send a TPE, we just say user agent. This reads as if an extension for privacy must not set DNT:1, which is contrary to what we’d had. Is this a deliberate change? The final paragraph of 5.1 has always been both contentious and poorly drafted (I’ll take blame for the later as result of the former.) Rather than re-open the normative text, I suggest we just give an example of interpreting DNT unset as DNT:1 in the EU and DNT:0 in the US. Does anyone object? Aleecia > On May 7, 2018, at 3:35 AM, Mike O'Neill <michael.oneill@baycloud.com> wrote: > > As requested in the last call I have created a PR against master for the > purpose changes. > > This is a readable snapshot of the document showing the TPE if the PR is > merged: > > https://w3c.github.io/dnt/drafts/purposes-snapshotmay2018.html > > See 5.2.1, 5.2.2, 6.6.1 and 7.5.10 > > Mike > >
Received on Sunday, 13 May 2018 01:41:11 UTC