RE: Topics for tomorrow

>> (...) I don't understand why the opinion is unlikely to show support for DNT.

My mistake, support is not the right wording. It is a matter of scope, i.e. DNT is addressed in other guidance (for instance guidance on the ePR).

Rob

 -----Original message-----
From: Jeff Jaffe
Sent: Wednesday, November 15 2017, 3:53 pm
To: Rob van Eijk; Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation); public-tracking@w3.org (public-tracking@w3.org)
Subject: Re: Topics for tomorrow

 
 On 11/15/2017 6:29 AM, Rob van Eijk wrote:

Hi Matthias,

 
Just read the minutes.

 
>> schunter: If the WP29 opinion shows support for automated means such as DNT, that will help get interest.

 
The Working Party is working on Consent Guidelines in article 4(11) of the GDPR. This is mentioned in the public agenda of the working party [1].


 
The notion of consent in the draft ePR is linked to the notion of consent in the GDPR. Because DNT is linked to ePR-consent, and given the guidance by the working group on the ePR, it is unlikely that the opinion will show support for DNT.


I can't claim to understand the politics of what shows support for what, but I don't understand why the opinion is unlikely to show support for DNT.

W3M was on a path to close TPWG 18 months ago.  We reversed that path because we were told that DNT was critical for GDPR.  I infer that it is not the case that DNT is critical for GDPR and we were mistaken when we reversed path 18 months ago.  Am I understanding this correctly?
 
 
Rob

 
 
[1] http://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/document.cfm?doc_id=47530 

 
—
PGP fingerprint: 704F 4955 F7E3 044E 4084 19E2 2844 CDDC A655 DB3C [public_key]

PGP verification is published in DNS which is secured by DNSSEC [rob._pka.blaeu.com]

 
 
 
-----Original message-----
From: Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation)
Sent: Sunday, November 12 2017, 9:18 am
To: public-tracking@w3.org (public-tracking@w3.org)
Subject: Topics for tomorrow
 
Hi Folks,

I suggest to discuss three topics:
1. How to get text proposals for issue 60 (purposes)
2. Actions to kick-off 2018 charter and to get new members joining
3. Status of implementations (needed for REC).

Regards,
matthias