Thanks, Mike, and thanks for your on formatting tables. We spoke a little today on the call but I didn’t address this as cleanly as I should have in places plus there are interested people who weren’t on the call, so I figured I’d revisit here. > On Jun 21, 2017, at 11:35 PM, Mike O'Neill <michael.oneill@baycloud.com> wrote: > > Hi Aleecia, > > What differs between DNT:0 and DNT:1 could also be a function of the jurisdiction or claimed compliance regime i.e. in the “compliance” property, which is the sensible place to reference the EFF policy document or a ePR compliance document, there would be then no need for the site to reiterate it in the privacy policy. As mentioned today, my hope was not to have a chunk of text with the whole compliance (or other) document, but rather what changes between DNT:1 and DNT:0 for that site, specifically. That will usually be a subset of the issues covered in any given policy document. I’ll try to make this more clear in the examples. > You could maybe mention that in the EFF/EU example. Good. I’ll work on that specifically. > BTW I think the existing last sentence in 6.5.8 makes no sense, that should be “compliance”, not “controller”. As that was not text I touched, I’ll leave that for editors to reply to if they like. Aleecia
Received on Monday, 26 June 2017 23:49:03 UTC